Gnostic, Canonical, deutero-canonical and non-Canonical...HELP I'm going mad!

  • Thread starter Thread starter FightingFat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

FightingFat

Guest
I’m becoming a bit embroiled in a Gnosis argument and need to ask for your assistance people!

I am aware that there are a number of ‘Gospels’ that were not included in the Canon. We call these texts ‘Gnostic’ as I understand it.

I also know we use lots of texts that are not included in the Bible, writings of the Church Fathers etc.

What’s the difference between Gnostic texts and non-canonical texts?

What makes a text ‘Gnostic’? When we quote documents like ‘The Protoevangelium of James’ what gives it more validity than say, the Gospel of Thomas?

Students of Gnosis would level the accusation that the other ‘Gnostic texts’ contain truths filtered out by the Church, my initial defense would be that they contain accounts that conflict each other whereas the Canonical Gospels corroborate each other.

Look forward to your replies!

Mark.
 
Here is a breakdown of the different varieties of Scripture and other religious writings, and how our terms differ from the Protestants.

Canonical: all of the 66 books accepted by both Catholics and Protestants.

Deuterocanonical: (second canon) 7 books of the old testament that are part of the Septuagint and accepted as fully canonical by Catholics, but rejected by the Protestants, who call these books the Apocrypha (hidden). These books are Tobith, Judith, 1 and 2 Macabees, the Wisdom of Sirach, Wisdom, Baruch, and parts of Edith and Daniel. Protestants claim that St. Jerome, who translated the Vulgate, rejected these books, but they his comments out of context, and it wasn’t Jerome’s call anyway, he was a traslator, not a member of the ecuminical council that determined the canon.

Apocrypha (hidden): Works that are considered written or attributed to biblical people or men closely associated with them, but not considered divinely inspired. There is an excellent write-up in the Catholic Encylopedia here. There is also an excellent article about the differences, including the LDS take on the whole matter here.

Pseudepigrapha (things falsely written):a collection of early Jewish and some Jewish-Christian writings composed between c.200 B.C. and c.A.D. 200, not found in the Bible or rabbinic writings. These works are usually written anonymously. Excellent article and listing here.

Gnosticism (the way of knowledge): a sect of christianity, with some pre-christian roots that places the salvation of the soul merely in the possession of a quasi-intuitive knowledge of the mysteries of the universe and of magic formulae indicative of that knowledge. Gnostics were “people who knew”, and their knowledge at once constituted them a superior class of beings, whose present and future status was essentially different from that of those who, for whatever reason, did not know. Excellent Catholic perspective here.

Excellent secular write-up here. The most famous “Gnostic” writing is the famous “Gospel of Thomas” which was the subject of the movie Stigmata.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top