L
Linusthe2nd
Guest
I’ve been thinking over my comments above and find that post # 197, while stating nothing untrue, was extremely lacking in charity, it was too cold, too matter of fact, and not a little arrogant. Further it unnecessarily angered a good man and one who is very intelligent, and one who has always demonstrated good will all around. I sincerely hope he will come back here somewhere, at some point.
I should not have commented without considering all these factors, and until I had considered how to respond without causing offense. My follow up post # 198 was correct enough, yet still too stark - given the nature of my first post.
The bottom line of my second post is a fact we all need to consider. No matter how good our intentions, we cannot sacrifice the high ground in hopes of winning over the skeptic.
Linus2nd.
I should not have commented without considering all these factors, and until I had considered how to respond without causing offense. My follow up post # 198 was correct enough, yet still too stark - given the nature of my first post.
The bottom line of my second post is a fact we all need to consider. No matter how good our intentions, we cannot sacrifice the high ground in hopes of winning over the skeptic.
Linus2nd.