ok…the other thread was not helpful, the guy was just getting half answers. however, i walked to the ymca and worked out and came back home and now i think i have an answer. if this is wrong please comment since it’s sorta way out there but… essentially what i realized was that time doesn’t work the same for God. when we live our lives, we look back, in the present, and in the future. However, God’s time is different, and instead of using time, God just is, and he looks back, now, and forward all at once. When he creates us, he has this sort of mind, and so when we fall away, to him we fall away in that same now, then, and later fashion and so knowing we are doomed doesn’t really come into play because that’s just looking into the future. really…i’d like comments because that sounds pretty funny
Your thoughts seem to be getting close to the mark, Mark.
The problem you pose seems to be saying that God’s foreknowledge seems to exclude any good reason for making someone who will choose to sin against him, even mortally.
As far as I can tell, the traditional answer seems to be that any perceived problem is due to us attributing a too-human conception of foreknowledge to God. I’ve heard the analogy that time with regards to God is like an eternal now. I think that insight is a very helpful way to think about the situation.
The problem of Divine Foreknowledge is usually put in terms of free-will vs. determinism. The argument goes that if God knows that something will happen, then it will necessarily happen (otherwise God wouldn’t be all-knowing). But if something will necessarily happen, how can I use my free-will to change it?
One of my professors didn’t think the idea of an ‘eternal now’ fixed the problem. He summarized the argument this way:
- Necessarily, if God knows that p, then p.
- Necessarily God knows that p.
- Therefore, necessarily p.
You can see that 3, the conclusion, does not follow from both premises. Basically, the “necessarily” in premise 1 surrounds the whole if/then statement. Premise 2 instantiates the if/then statement of premise 1, but 3 is not the result of the instantiation. The actual result would be just p, and not necessarily p.
I contend that my professor is right, and that the conclusion doesn’t follow. However, I think that the idea of an ‘eternal now’ gets us closer to the vital insight that what determines the truth-value about our actions are the actions themselves, and not God’s knowledge.
So perhaps we do not understand Divine Foreknowledge completely, but it at least doesn’t seem to be incompatible with human free-will.
Anyways, back to your post. It seems that you allude to Judas being in hell. I would contend that we do not know if that is the case or not, even if we knew that he fell away from Christ by betraying him.
The basic answer I would give to the reason why God would create someone, knowing that they will betray Him, is the same reason why He creates any human being at all, regardless if they betray him or not–it is irrelevant.
Good question. Ask questions where I don’t make sense.