Government and the War on Drugs

  • Thread starter Thread starter BioCatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

BioCatholic

Guest
Ive been considering writing an Op-Ed piece on the current situation on illegal drugs and the possible solutions to the rising incidence of addiction.

In one possible scenario, in large cities, a State could almost eliminate the inflow of most if not all drugs using various proven methods, just on a massive scale. If a State utilized ALL the resources at its disposal, and I mean massive resources, it could reduce the flow of drugs to nil.

Now the question I am wrestling with is what is done about the people addicted to drugs? Assuming all drug flow is stopped, there are going to be a huge amount of cases of withdrawal. Some cases so severe that the user would most likely die or commit suicide.

Which is a higher priority? Does the State 1) work to strictly enforce all legitimately passed drug laws and drastically reduce crime to protect innocent citizens, or 2) would the horrible widespread effect of eliminating drugs on addicted persons outweigh the the Executive duty to enforce Laws passed by a duly elected Legislature?

I for one take the position that the Laws must be enforced FIRST, and the duty of the State is to first and foremost protect its citizens from violent crime and drugs. Even if it means many drug users are severely affected or die. I’m not saying that the State shouldn’t work to help these people, but the consequences on drug users of a large-scale drug enforcement should not affect the execution of the State’s forgoing powers to enforce the Laws.

Anyone else have a take on this?
 
The state’s responsibility is first and foremost to its citizens, among which drug addicts most certainly are counted. If by its direct actions it causes harm to its citizens, those actions are unquestionably wrong.

Laws are not some idol for the government, as you seem to suppose; they are its tools, and it is granted them only to serve the citizens. The state is not our master, it is our servant.

Of course, this pie isn’t just in the sky, it’s somewhere out in the Kuiper belt. Large-scale enforcement didn’t work for Prohibition, it’s not working now, and it won’t ever work completely or even nearly so as long as people are people. Remember, the Mongols got through the Great Wall not through sieges or battering-rams, but through a few bags of rice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top