A
AlexV
Guest
Regarding Kielbasi’s comments about “Polka Masses” and their celebration in St. Peter’s…
Irrelevant, and who cares, quite frankly? First of all the whole concept of a “Polka Mass” reveals staggering artistic, aesthetic, liturgical, and cultural ignorance of mind-boggling proportions. Second, if such a travesty occurred in St. Peter’s, that hardly validates it.
Just because John Paul II allowed it in St. Peter’s does not make it right, or appropriate…except for papolaters who think anything a pope allows is somehow sanctioned.
There is a difference in Catholic theology between the person of the pope and the teaching office of the pope, the Magisterium…and no, “Polka Masses” haven’t been approved by the Magisterium. Just by the person of John Paul II. Big difference.
There’s a lot more at stake in liturgy than the minimum standard of “Was it a validly confected Eucharist?”
A Satanic priest can validly confect the Eucharist. Doesn’t make it any less an abomination.
Irrelevant, and who cares, quite frankly? First of all the whole concept of a “Polka Mass” reveals staggering artistic, aesthetic, liturgical, and cultural ignorance of mind-boggling proportions. Second, if such a travesty occurred in St. Peter’s, that hardly validates it.
Just because John Paul II allowed it in St. Peter’s does not make it right, or appropriate…except for papolaters who think anything a pope allows is somehow sanctioned.
There is a difference in Catholic theology between the person of the pope and the teaching office of the pope, the Magisterium…and no, “Polka Masses” haven’t been approved by the Magisterium. Just by the person of John Paul II. Big difference.
There’s a lot more at stake in liturgy than the minimum standard of “Was it a validly confected Eucharist?”
A Satanic priest can validly confect the Eucharist. Doesn’t make it any less an abomination.