M
Mur
Guest
My husband is a lapsed Catholic. Has not attended since he was 12. I am converting. What does it mean to have our marriage “blessed”? We were married at a courthouse…Thanks a lot for trying to help me with my question.
First…have either of you been previously married?My husband is a lapsed Catholic. Has not attended since he was 12. I am converting. What does it mean to have our marriage “blessed”? We were married at a courthouse…Thanks a lot for trying to help me with my question.
Yes some of it depends on whether either of you have been married before. If there are previous marriages, you will have to go through the process of annulment before anything else can take place.My husband is a lapsed Catholic. Has not attended since he was 12. I am converting. What does it mean to have our marriage “blessed”? We were married at a courthouse…Thanks a lot for trying to help me with my question.
My recommendation is that you speak to yoru parish priest and/or ask this on the “ask an apologist” forum…I was married before, he was not. We have both been baptized. He as a Catholic, myself as a Methodist. My first marriage was invalid, I have paperwork in progress. My first husband was not free to marry. What I want to know is what is “blessing a marriage”. My husband wants to know if that means we have to be remarried in the church. And if for some reason, that didn’t happen, would I be able to take communion if for some reason…he did not fully reactivate…
Thanks a lot for your reply.
:tiphat:
SarahSmile said:To my belief, since your husband is Catholic he cannot recieve Holy Communion b/c he is living in sin. Catholics must be married in a Catholic Church or under the eyes of God, there is no marriage. I hope this helps you…
I respectfully disagree with this part. I do believe the Church recognizes civil marriagesand there is no “living in sin” due this fact.
But…this matter is important so I’d get a professional opinion!!
SarahSmile:
**If one person is a Catholic than it is a sin. They are bound to the sacraments, Matrimony is a sacrament. **I do believe the Church recognizes civil marriagesand there is no “living in sin” due this fact.
But…this matter is important so I’d get a professional opinion!!
I respectfully disagree with this part.
"The sacrament forms the stable basis of the whole Christian community. Without it, Christ’s design for human love is not fullfilled…" “The sacrament of matrimony was instituted by Christ as an outward sign both of God’s grace and our faith.” Catholicism & Society Chap 3 pg31.
If you don’t invite God to your wedding how can he bless it??
No one here can possibly advise you. Are you Catholic? If so, talk with your pastor. He can ask the questions that need to be asked and can give you an answer.Does it matter if the couple had a previous marriage and if so why?? I was married Lutheran and divorced. I was remarried by a JOP by then had marriage blessed by Catholic church. Based upon those facts can I still celebrate in confession and communion.
the proper term is convalidation, that means that because your husband is Catholic, he was required to get married according to Church law (vows witnessed by a priest or deacon) but he did not, so he is not validly married. Convalidation is an exchange of vows before the proper witness, in church, after due preparation, so as the word suggests, makes the union valid. It is important to him as he cannot return to good standing in the Church until he does this because it means he is objectively in a state of sin and unable to receive the other sacraments. For a Catholic, being separated from Jesus Christ in the Eucharist is the worst thing that can happen on this earth, worse than death. It also means that before you can become CAtholic, the marriage would need to be valid (convalidated) so that you could receive the other sacraments.My husband is a lapsed Catholic. Has not attended since he was 12. I am converting. What does it mean to have our marriage “blessed”? We were married at a courthouse…Thanks a lot for trying to help me with my question.
What is interesting is that though the marriage is considered invalid an annullment process is needed in case of a divorce, in which case the church finds the marriage valid.the proper term is convalidation, that means that because your husband is Catholic, he was required to get married according to Church law (vows witnessed by a priest or deacon) but he did not, so he is not validly married. Convalidation is an exchange of vows before the proper witness, in church, after due preparation, so as the word suggests, makes the union valid. It is important to him as he cannot return to good standing in the Church until he does this because it means he is objectively in a state of sin and unable to receive the other sacraments. For a Catholic, being separated from Jesus Christ in the Eucharist is the worst thing that can happen on this earth, worse than death. It also means that before you can become CAtholic, the marriage would need to be valid (convalidated) so that you could receive the other sacraments.
Welcome home
see your priest who can guide you through the procedure
I am sorry I don’t understand your statement or how it relates to OP’s question. guess I am more tired than I thought. Every marriage is presumed valid until proven otherwise, and a civil divorce does not end a valid marriage. So if someone who has been previously married and divorce wishes to now marry a Catholic, or if a divorced Catholic wishes to remarry, the first marriage must be investigated to determine if it was valid or not, only only if it is found null (the process does not annul a valid marriage, it merely issues a judgment about validity) are the parties free to marry. If they have in the meantime contracted another civil marriage, that marriage must now be convalidated, that is, the consent witnessed by a priest or deacon.What is interesting is that though the marriage is considered invalid an annullment process is needed in case of a divorce, in which case the church finds the marriage valid.
First you state that a marriage is presumed valid, then later state the marriage must be investigated to determine if valid. Seems like a cycle of contradiction, loads of red tape and all in the name of a bureaucracy.I am sorry I don’t understand your statement or how it relates to OP’s question. guess I am more tired than I thought. Every marriage is presumed valid until proven otherwise, and a civil divorce does not end a valid marriage. So if someone who has been previously married and divorce wishes to now marry a Catholic, or if a divorced Catholic wishes to remarry, the first marriage must be investigated to determine if it was valid or not, only only if it is found null (the process does not annul a valid marriage, it merely issues a judgment about validity) are the parties free to marry. If they have in the meantime contracted another civil marriage, that marriage must now be convalidated, that is, the consent witnessed by a priest or deacon.
The presumption is that a marriage is valid. However, if one of the parties to a marriage claims that it was not valid then a Tribunal can investigate to determine if it was or wasn’t valid. If no marriage ever took place – in other words, it was invalid – then the parties are free to marry.First you state that a marriage is presumed valid, then later state the marriage must be investigated to determine if valid. Seems like a cycle of contradiction, loads of red tape and all in the name of a bureaucracy.