R
rben20
Guest
Hello Catholics and other peeps,
I recently got into an argument over Hell, Purgatory, and Indulgences. If you all could better help me explain the Catholic position and even continue the debate I would appreciate it. I started to ask questions after explaining the Faith to a protestant friend. If you can reply to each as they are all very similar.
I recently got into an argument over Hell, Purgatory, and Indulgences. If you all could better help me explain the Catholic position and even continue the debate I would appreciate it. I started to ask questions after explaining the Faith to a protestant friend. If you can reply to each as they are all very similar.
- Man through original sin is on the path to Hell. Through repentance, acceptance of Christ, and living a sacramental life we can avoid Hell and be with the Holy Trinity in Heaven. Now my protestant friend claimed that those who were non-believers would go to Hell. I agreed to an extent but I said that we could not really say those who are ignorant of Christ (some tribe in Africa for example) are not really at fault and not necessarily going straight to Hell because they never heard the Gospel or know of the Holy Trinity. They claimed that according to the OT an ignorant non-believer of today is paining for the sinfulness of his parents who did not teach them the faith or learn of the faith therefore, it is fine that they will go to Hell. The question ended up being if God says this in the OT (parents sins pass down), then why would it be wrong for african tribal people to go to Hell? They did not cite this at all with me but told me so. Are we really to comment on who will go to heaven or hell based on ignorance of the Gospels?
- My protestant friend believes only in a heaven and hell while I imposed that there is a purgatory. I said it wasn’t so much a place of focus as is the process that is the main focus…a purifying of the soul to enter heaven. My protestant friend claimed that Jesus then died for nothing. I was confused but understood later what he meant…that Jesus died for all sins so a purifying of the soul would be pointless if Christ had already paid for the sins. I told him Christ did die for our sins but that humanity was redeemed allowing us to have our sins forgiven and washed away but that we could still sin. Was this a correct response?
- Lastly I became confused with myself in the teaching of indulgences. While I know they deal with temporal punishment as does purgatory how does the Church KNOW that such an indulgence rids a man of punishment for so many days or years? Doesn’t it seem too legalistic? How can the Church even know this?