R
RyanL
Guest
If you want to compare/contrast, the CA tract Pillar of Fire, Pillar of Truth takes a similar tact (although in my opinion the tracts are often too polemic). I like the way yours reads better, but you might contrast to see if you’ve covered the same scriptural bases (and if not, make sure it’s a conscious decision).
Also, I would try to shore up the reason why the four marks are used. The Baptist pamphlets "Trail of Blood and The Baptist Way also identify “marks” of the “true Christian Church”, but they’re seemingly arbitrary. (They also trace their succession through such notibles as the Albigensians, but that’s another story.) Let the reader know why the Bible and history both agree that these are essential; you might also point to the fact that every mainline Protestant denomination accepts the Nicene Creed as partial evidence of the credibility - but then again, that might do more harm than good.
Just my thoughts. Keep up the good work!
God Bless,
RyanL
Also, I would try to shore up the reason why the four marks are used. The Baptist pamphlets "Trail of Blood and The Baptist Way also identify “marks” of the “true Christian Church”, but they’re seemingly arbitrary. (They also trace their succession through such notibles as the Albigensians, but that’s another story.) Let the reader know why the Bible and history both agree that these are essential; you might also point to the fact that every mainline Protestant denomination accepts the Nicene Creed as partial evidence of the credibility - but then again, that might do more harm than good.
Just my thoughts. Keep up the good work!
God Bless,
RyanL
