B
benjamindt
Guest
I don’t know if this is a taboo subject or something but I’ve got a conflict in my mind about this topic and I’d appreciate some help so that I can understand the truth and do what’s right.
My question is about the protestant versions of the bible.
I know books were removed, and done so by usurping the authority bestowed upon the Church by Christ Himself.
I also know that what Luther and Wycliffe and others did with sacred scripture was heretical in nature.
Therefore, how can we be in the right if we give another person a copy of the bible that is not approved by the Church? I understand it still has some of God’s Truth in it. The problem I have is that it also works in a way intent on deceiving people from the whole Truth and it directly undermines the Church and in turn, Christ Himself.
So why should I treat a work of heresy as anything but a work of heresy?
My question is about the protestant versions of the bible.
I know books were removed, and done so by usurping the authority bestowed upon the Church by Christ Himself.
I also know that what Luther and Wycliffe and others did with sacred scripture was heretical in nature.
Therefore, how can we be in the right if we give another person a copy of the bible that is not approved by the Church? I understand it still has some of God’s Truth in it. The problem I have is that it also works in a way intent on deceiving people from the whole Truth and it directly undermines the Church and in turn, Christ Himself.
So why should I treat a work of heresy as anything but a work of heresy?