C
Cris07
Guest
I understand all the moral and theological implications on the HHS mandate. But, I don’t understand how paying taxes that can then be used to provide sterilizations, abortifacients, and contraception for low-income women is not morally wrong and is not a violation of my conscience (or is it?!). But, mandating an employer to provide his employees with a health insurance plan that covers those services is. This is an argument I have encountered from several non-Catholic friends and I’m afraid I can’t come up with a coherent asnwer. I usually mumble something about “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s”, the First Amendment, and the Religous Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
Is it a matter of degrees of separation from the intrinsically evil act and the one providing the funding? I know I am missing something probably pretty obvious, but I can’t see it.
Thanks!
Is it a matter of degrees of separation from the intrinsically evil act and the one providing the funding? I know I am missing something probably pretty obvious, but I can’t see it.
Thanks!