D
DD2007
Guest
Is there any justification at all for using the historical-critical method of interpreting scripture as opposed to the historical-gramatical method?
I have found that especially in the NAB Notes, the Oxford anotated Bible etc, and with all liberal Christian bodies the historical-critical method is used. The historical-critical method has also made great headway in the modern Catholic Church.
With all conservative bodies the historical-gramatical method is used.
Does anyone use and justify the historical-critical method? I am seeing some problems with it and would like to discuss it with some who defend it.
Thanks.
I have found that especially in the NAB Notes, the Oxford anotated Bible etc, and with all liberal Christian bodies the historical-critical method is used. The historical-critical method has also made great headway in the modern Catholic Church.
With all conservative bodies the historical-gramatical method is used.
Does anyone use and justify the historical-critical method? I am seeing some problems with it and would like to discuss it with some who defend it.
Thanks.