Hollywood Makes a Pro-Life Movie!

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffalo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

buffalo

Guest
**Hollywood Makes a Pro-Life Movie!
August 10. 2005
**
by: Phyllis Schlafly​
Surprise, surprise. In the midst of the current controversy in Congress about whether to maintain President Bush’s principle that it is unethical to create human life for the purpose of destroying it, Hollywood released a big-budget pro-life movie.

The movie, called “The Island,” is an expensive sci-fi action thriller that reportedly cost about $120 million. Its powerful message against creating human life in a laboratory came through loud and clear despite the ingenious and noisy special effects.

“The Island” tells the story of a government-funded billion-dollar laboratory hidden in the Arizona desert in 2019 where scientists do cloning on a mass scale. They sell $5 million “insurance policies” to rich people who want to live forever by buying replacement body parts.

The scientists agree to follow ethical guidelines in their cloning, and falsely tell their customers that the clones are in a “vegetative state” unable to know or feel anything. But the scientists get better results by violating the guidelines and so they go to extraordinary lengths to keep secret the very existence of their adult clones as well as the whole operation.

Hundreds of clones are quarantined and kept obedient in a totally regulated underground compound by telling them that the entire United States is contaminated by a worldwide environmental catastrophe and that anyone who ventures outside will die. The clones are deliberately educated only to a 15-year-old mental level and, for entertainment, are allowed to read Dick and Jane primers.

(Dick and Jane books were written for 6-to-8-year-olds. Was this a side commentary that kids are now so illiterate that 15-year-olds are able to read only at an elementary school level?)

The scientists conduct lotteries in which the winner is told he wins release to an uncontaminated island paradise. In fact, the winner is taken to be killed after his body parts are surgically removed for sale.

The lab chief tries to justify his enterprise by claiming to seek a cure for leukemia, but that’s bogus; killing has become his daily business. It is far more profitable to manufacture humans, harvest and sell their body parts, and then kill the clones.

Like the old westerns where the good guys wear white hats and the bad guys wear black hats, “The Island” conveniently clothes the good guys (the clones) in all white and the bad guys (the scientists) in all black. The scientists are Dr. Frankenstein villains.

The movie teaches the lesson that scientists allowed to engage in what is called therapeutic cloning cannot be trusted to stick to ethical procedures. As the movie’s top scientist says, they think they have discovered the Holy Grail of Science and can play God with life, so they just create and destroy human life like laboratory products.

When the top scientist feels threatened because one clone unexpectedly develops human curiosity about what is going on, the scientist hires a professional hit man. When he discovers that human lives are being created and destroyed with no likelihood of saving anyone, even the hit man can’t take it any more and refuses to do any more killing for the lab.

In April 2002, President Bush warned that cloning will lead to experimental human beings, “embryo farms,” and “a society in which human beings are grown for spare body parts and children are engineered to custom specifications.” “The Island” dramatizes the truth of his prediction.

Director Michael Bay denies that “The Island” has a message, but he admits that the movie will “open discussion,” and he poses this question: “Would you be selfish enough to take someone’s life to live longer?”

Indeed, that question exposes the evil behind cloning, which is an essential step in the proposed embryonic stem cell therapies. Cloning involves the creation and destruction of innocent human life for utilitarian and very selfish purposes.

It defies all we know about human nature to believe that if embryonic stem cell research were allowed and financed, it would never be used for unethical purposes. We couldn’t enforce such a prohibition even if we stationed a policeman in every laboratory.

It also doesn’t make sense to proceed with experimentation on human life without first demonstrating success on animals.
 
The public is smarter than the politicians who appear to be bamboozled by amoral scientists, universities greedy for more billions of taxpayers’ money, and profit-motivated enterprises that want the taxpayers to finance their research and development costs.

Last year’s most critically acclaimed movie was “Million Dollar Baby,” advertised as a boxing movie. When the word got out that it was a pro-euthanasia-propaganda movie, it did poorly at the box office.

Let’s hope that “The Island” will show Senator Bill Frist what’s down the road he has started to travel, financed with the people’s money. It’s a future that Americans must reject before it’s too late; 2019 isn’t all that far off.
 
40.png
AmyS:
A movie I want to see! 👍 How rare.
If you want to see a lame Jerry Bruckheimer atrophy-fest on the merit of a review by that hag Phyllis Schlafly, you’re welcome to it. Enjoy your brainwash, and don’t forget your popcorn.
 
Movie to rent: “Parts: The Clonus Horror.”

Incidentally, other pro-life MUST sees are:
–Minority Report
–Entropy
 
As with most movies, I think I will wait until it is on cable. Cannot see paying over $15 for a movie ticket plus snacks.

PF
 
40.png
adstrinity:
Incidentally, other pro-life MUST sees are:
–Minority Report
How do you figure? I enjoyed minority report, and I’d be interested in how you see it as a pro-life movie.
 
Philip P:
How do you figure? I enjoyed minority report, and I’d be interested in how you see it as a pro-life movie.
I’m not sure exactly what adstrinity meant, but I can offer my own thoughts. One of the moral dilemmas in the film is the question of whether or not it is acceptable to cause harm to a few people in order to promote the good of society. The three ‘precogs’ are basically imprisoned and forced to dwell on traumatizing events. This certainly isn’t a very humane way to treat them, but it does promote the welfare of society by eliminating murder. Is it acceptable? The movie’s message is that this is unacceptable. This could be applied to issues such as embryonic stem cell research: is it acceptable to kill some human beings if it will benefit society? Using the morality of Minority Report, the answer would be ‘no’ (especially given the existence of many more effective and proven stem cells that don’t require the death of a human being).
 
Philip P:
How do you figure? I enjoyed minority report, and I’d be interested in how you see it as a pro-life movie.
G&G pretty much got it, but, not all of it.

Okay, pay attention to when the woman in her botanical garden is telling John Anderton about how this all started. This started as treatement for the addict children (who were junkie babies because of their mom’s). However, they soon noted that the treatment did things more to these children, whose nightmares could see the murders in the future. NOTE, that she said that she & the man who started this joked that they were the Eve & Adam of this…note, also, that she says this in a garden.

Anyway, for this Utopia to exist, what must happen? These three humans (the female being the most important), must not be so human. Remember earlier in the movie when they were in “The Temple”? The room where the Pre-Cogs dormed? There was really only one person allowed in that room until Anderton saw the warrant from the government. They admitted, they did not want to think of these people AS human. They wanted to distance themselves from them so as to not get too personal. “It’s best not to think of them as human.” “Oh no, they’re much more than that.” ALSO, they were kept in a kind of drowsed off state…not too awake, not too asleep. Just conscience enough to serve their purpose.

And John truly wanted to believe this because he got involved with this so that nothing like what happened to his son ever happened again…in the meantime, MANY children were killed…did the children the scientists killed outnumber the lives they saved?

They were lied about to the public. I think it was excellent how they portrayed them to the public (remember the field trip going through? Like the Pre-Cogs were practically royalty?).

They had to expirement to get THESE three. BACK AGAIN to the woman in the garden: “Do you think that they were just ~born~ that way?!!” This entire speech. Please, do me a favour and rent the movie again and watch it with the attitude that it is a pro-life movie. It will fit like The Wall soundtrack to The Wizzard of Oz. Anyway, she said that there had to be many tests and experements and test tubes to get where they are today; that is why she left, because she could no longer stand the ethics of it.

THE END: Oh! This was just BEAUTIFUL!!! When it all unravels (I didn’t know this was a pro-life movie either until a friend pointed it out.) Agatha’s mother was an addict, but, she cleaned up. Lamar couldn’t have this because he NEEDED Agatha to proove that the system worked. Sooooo…he needed to kill her mother to keep using her as a human guinea pig, “She didn’t die…but she’s not alive.”

As previously stated, Q&Q is right, my friend & I did feel that it DID make some pretty pro-life statements that could be applied to stem-cell research. It pretty much makes all of them. PLEASE please please please rent it again & when you have time (if you have time this weekend), watch it.
 
so “the island” really is pro-life? i knew there was a reason i wanted to watch this.
 
40.png
adstrinity:
G&G pretty much got it, but, not all of it.

wow. i admit i didn’t see it this way. i was so absorbed in disproving the logic of “predicting the future.” thanks for these points!
 
40.png
adstrinity:
Incidentally, other pro-life MUST sees are:
–Minority Report
–Entropy
I would add Gattaca, a thoughtful movie about genetic engineering. The hero is relegated to the lowest echelon of society since he was conceived as a “faith child” out of the love of his parents.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top