M
mrsed
Guest
A relative had been married for more than 20 years. His wife left him for a female ‘friend’. Would this be a valid reason to seek an annulment?
What happens after a marriage takes place is not relevant for puposes of annulments. It is what is known prior to the marriage that is taken into account.A relative had been married for more than 20 years. His wife left him for a female ‘friend’. Would this be a valid reason to seek an annulment?
What happens after the marriage takes place can be relevant if it points to the problem that existed at the time of the marriage.What happens after a marriage takes place is not relevant for puposes of annulments. It is what is known prior to the marriage that is taken into account.
not by itself no, but it may shed light on the situation that pertained at the time of the original contract, so yes that is definitely something he should include in his interview. He needs to see is own priest, assuming he already is civilly divorced and there is no possibility of reconciliation, and get things started and get answers that apply to his specific situation.A relative had been married for more than 20 years. His wife left him for a female ‘friend’. Would this be a valid reason to seek an annulment?