R
roemer
Guest
I know someone who recieved an honorary, unearned doctorate ( not a PhD). But she uses this ceremonial title in her professional life. Outside of being vain , how dishonest is it ?
Technically speaking, they can refer to themselves a ‘Dr.’ but it is very much frowned upon. And if they list it among ‘qualifications’ it should be made perfectly clear that the degree is honorary.Many universities (and now colleges) grant a degree called an honorary doctorate to persons they want to honor or recognize (usually a dignitary, benefactor, or notable alumni). However, neither the university nor the honoree are naive enough to believe the honor actually conferred a full doctorate, thus most people with honorary degrees are discouraged from using them in public, though certainly many do. In the end, of course, it’s the job-seeker’s decision.
I do believe that all the Bishops of Ireland are referred to as “Doctor”, probably from their D.D. degrees, in most cases one would presume.Usually, the degree is indicated by a designation different from an earned degree. DHL, for example, Doctor of Humane Letters, is not a degree that can ever be earned. D.D. (Doctor of Divinity) is another. It is considered tacky to refer to oneself as “Doctor” if one does not hold the academic degree.
Yes. They’re called “doctor.”I do believe that all the Bishops of Ireland are referred to as “Doctor”, probably from their D.D. degrees, in most cases one would presume.
Maybe somebody can verify this.
That has to do with their teaching function, not their degree level (though most do have SSD’s or STD’s) . Doctor is Latin for ‘teacher’.Yes. They’re called “doctor.”
According to my Cassell’s paperback Latin - English dictionary, “medicus” is Latin for “doctor.”That has to do with their teaching function, not their degree level (though most do have SSD’s or STD’s) . Doctor is Latin for ‘teacher’.
Well, I still think it’s pretentious. I saw this kind of thing all the time in the bling-bling theology movement.Now for the rest of the story …
The person in question is none other than Colleen Kelly Mast, co-host of The Doctor is In.
Now watch the tone of the replies change from unfavorable to favorable.
To avoid just this sort of confusion, the longstanding tradition at the University of Chicago is only to refer to physicians as “doctor” with other teahers who have doctorates by their more common formal title (such as “Mister”).According to my Cassell’s paperback Latin - English dictionary, “medicus” is Latin for “doctor.”
“Magister” is Latin for “teacher!” Ooooooooops! I see that “doctor” also is Latin for teacher. I need a bigger Latin dictionary.
Anybody know what the difference is, in Latin, between “magister” and “doctor?”
I am currently in a masters program, and have always been directed to address my professor as Dr. Whoever. I feel this is appropriate within the field the doctorate was earned. I am a student in structural engineering, and my professors have earned their PhD, and therefore deserve the title of doctor in this setting. In fact, I prefer it, as it allows the student a way to distinguish between the true research faculty and the “hired guns” teaching from industry.I’m in a PhD program, and I’ve always been told that even those who earn PhD’s shouldn’t go by “doctor” - only medical doctors should use the title. I’ve never had a professor that went by “doctor” and I won’t use it myself when I finish my PhD. I’d feel really pretentious if I did.