Honouring of Mary and her assumption to heaven by the HS

  • Thread starter Thread starter Esdra
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
In the context of sanctification, “perfect” means completed.
So then, what you are saying is not that any human can be perfect, ‘perfect’ in this sense is a misnomer, it means the best possible example of being a human creature.
… By grace we are made partakers of His Divine nature.
Which then ‘perfect’ would be theoretically possible for all, I suppose.

Is grace a created thing, or is it God Himself? I would like to see this clarified.
Why do you think He would leave His mother out of His perfect plan of salvation for man?
This is a false accusation on your part and a red herring.
It is a puzzle why you would think that people could not have authentic experiences of God and the communion of the saints. :confused: This attitude is not consistent with Holy Orthodoxy!
I suppose that you are referring to hesychasm, otherwise you would have to make your point a little bit more precisely.

Messages from beyond are not generally trusted regardless of their content, this principle going back all the way to the desert fathers.

A brief example of thinking on the subject:
… If, however, by the command of God, one of the saints or angels wanted to appear to us in a material way, there is no transgression in this, for we didn’t desire this or seek after this. Yet, even in such cases, it is necessary for us to be very careful, humble, prudent and full of the fear of God, for knowing that Satan also assumes the guise of an angel, it may well be a fantasy of the Devil (2 Cor. 11:14-15). Of course, even when the vision is from God it is better for us not to receive it. For if we do this with humility God will not be sorrowful because He knows that we are taking heed not to accept within us the wolf instead of the shepherd. We don’t, indeed, have need of seeing the saints and angels, but only to pray with faith and internal vision. Saint Neilos the Ascetic says “Blessed is that intellect which arrives at the point of worshiping God without giving shape to His form within itself.”
Elder Cleopa of Romania

There are seven reasons that Christians are deceived into thinking that dreams and visions come from God. These are: pride; vainglory which is the first daughter of pride; a mind that is weak and dull in the faith; misplaced zeal of some Christians who purposely fast and pray specifically that they be granted visions…; then there is disobedience to the spiritual father and stubbornness on the part of some of the faithful…; because of the reclusive hidden life that some people lead and the failure to thoroughly confess all thoughts to the spiritual father; and the final reason that some Christians are deceived into believing in false dreams and visions is that they do not ‘know themselves’ and they fail to read the holy Scriptures and the holy fathers.
Elder Cleopa of Romania

An interesting comment from the renowned Carmelite, Saint John of the Cross:
It must be noted that all visions, revelations and feelings coming from Heaven, and any thoughts that may proceed from these, are of less worth than the least act of humility. And humility is one of the effects of charity, which esteems not its own things nor strives to attain them; nor thinks evil, save of itself; nor thinks any good thing of itself, but only of others. It is well, therefore, that these supernatural apprehensions should not attract men’s eyes, but that they should strive to forget them in order that they may be free.
She got her reputation by communicating with the faithful! If the communications were not authentic, then her reputation rests on “pious fiction”!
The authentic ‘reputation’ of the Holy Theotokos rests upon good solid theology. The alleged communications are post-Apostolic revelations which have no real value. In fact the principle of supernatural massages was condemned by the church with the Montanists.

Of all the apparitions of saint Mary none can be considered authoritative, but they seem to have a grip on a faction of Latin Catholics who are as a result pushing new dogmatic pronouncements. This is disturbing. It is as if the pure Faith handed to us from Christ through the Apostles is being polluted. This tendency should be reined in by the church, not encouraged!

If we take fictional messages and start to believe them, we are projecting. We are making an image of the divine and the afterworld that comes from our own imaginations, not Truth.
 
… according to the Marian Doctor St. Louis de Montfort …
I looked and cannot find anything that indicates Saint Louis de Montfort has been declared a Doctor of the church by any Pope, although it seems that some see him as a candidate for this recognition.

Do you have a reference for this?

I don’t know how one becomes a ‘candidate’ for the recognition. It would be nice if someone posted on the procedure.

Thanks,
 
According to my last statement, I was incorrect.

St. Louis de Montfort is in the process of being considered entitled a doctor of the Church.
I read his writings a number of years ago and a passing reference…this I read this am is from 2008.
 
Hesychios,

True Devotion to Mary is a short book written by him, another is ‘Secret of Mary’. Both atleast very interesting to read.

The Catholic Church’s stand was that the Heavenly Father created Mary sinless at her conception, and as she was sinless, she followed the same path as Jesus and was carried up to heaven. She has no tomb.

Why would there be no tomb for Mary?
 
I don’t know about a reference in Revelation. That’s pure speculation on the part of later thinkers and is not a source for the belief.

Belief in the bodily death, burial and assumption to heaven of Mary is Orthodox, and came to the Latin church from the east. It is a longstanding tradition, which is all we Orthodox need in order to believe it.

This is remembered every year on the Feast of the Dormition (Koimisis) which is preceded by a two week fast.

The event is depicted iconographically.

http://onlinechapel.goarch.org/images/SMALL/DORMITIO.JPG

Note that Jesus Our Lord is holding her soul, wrapped in swaddling clothes which look like a burial shroud.

We Christians believe in the bodily resurrection and Mary the mother of God is among the first fruits of the Promise.

There is a legend from Apostolic times, and although it has to be considered apocryphal in it’s details it explains why there have never been relics of the Holy Theotokos to venerate.

A brief summary of the Apostolic Christian belief:
Following the day of Pentecost, the Theotokos remained in the city of Jerusalem, comforting the infant Christian community. She was living in the house of the beloved Apostle John, later the Evangelist. At the time of her death (tradition states she was in her early fifties) many of the Apostles were scattered throughout the world preaching the Gospel. All but Thomas were miraculously brought to the Virgin aloft on clouds.

As they stood around her bedside, she commended her spirit to the Lord and Jesus descended from Heaven, taking up her soul in His arms. The Apostles sang the funeral hymns in her honor and carried her body to a tomb in Cedron near Gethsemane. …

The Apostle Thomas arrived on the third day (late again 🤷) and wished to see the Virgin for the last time. They discovered an empty tomb. Church tradition relates that the Theotokos was resurrected bodily and taken to heaven, the same reward that awaits all the righteous on the Last Day.
The Dormition of the Theotokos

Neither the grave nor death could contain the Theotokos, the unshakable hope, ever vigilant in intercession and protection. As Mother of life, He who dwelt in the ever-virginal womb transposed her to life.
Kontakion of the Feast of the Dormition
I have always appreciated the Orthodox view on this point and their stance is the easiest for me as a Protestant to “swallow.”
 
Hesychios,

I just came back from a weekend case, and I am being given a another 24 hour time starting tomorrow…and returning to another case today.

I am learning about Orthodoxy…the process for becoming a doctor of the church is comprehensive…St. Therese of Liseaux is now also a woman doctor of the Church along with St. Theresa of Avila and St. Catherine of Siena. The last I read was a statement St. Louis was becoming a doctor of the church may be 10 years ago…never referenced it afterwards…just drew on some memory and do not know the status of the case at present…except it looks like they are still studying his case.

I would look up more background on becoming a doctor but time constraints prevent.

I did not know that the Orthodox do not consider Mary sinless. From my own background, I would stay with the Latin dogma of her assumption into heaven. I have read the works of St. John Climacus, an eastern Desert Father…but saw no contradictions in his teachings on spirituality…

Must go for now…God bless!

Kathleen
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top