Horrifying baby decision

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdnation
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jdnation

Guest
An Australian court judge has ruled that physical violence to a pregnant woman’s abdomen to deliberately kill the unborn baby does not constitute murder—nor manslaughter—not even “grievous bodily harm”.

The case arose when a Sydney man could not persuade his girlfriend to abort their baby, so he attacked her when she was 24 weeks pregnant.

Tragically, the unborn baby bled to death, and “did not take a breath outside the uterus”.

While the judge acknowledged the woman had “some soreness”, there was no evidence to show grievous bodily harm. “At common law, a foetus cannot be a victim of violence.”

The Australian, 10 October 2003, p. 7.

The Bible makes it clear that the unborn baby is a person (Genesis 25:21–22, Psalm 139:13–16, Jeremiah 1:5, Luke 1:41–44). From conception, the embryo is biologically fully human, with its full complement of DNA. Well before the 24th week, this person is moving—even sucking a thumb. But the ruling, while distressing, is not surprising. Aided by large sectors of Christendom, Western society has rejected the Bible’s authority in Genesis in favour of the “scientific consensus”—which also says we are just evolved animals. Even endangered animals have received more sympathy from the courts.

-from Answers in Genesis.org
 
That’s the old-school method of abortion. When I was 8 or 9 I awoke in the middle of the night at my cousins’s house to hear my aunt screaming at my mother that she had seen my grandfather kicking my grandmother in the stomach when she was pregnant, circa 1928. I never found out for sure what happened with my grandparents, but he divorced her and moved thousands of miles away after that. And my family was cast down into hell for generations. Amazing how sin just goes on and on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top