How Can Fundamentalist Protestants Support the Death Penalty?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PatrickSebast
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PatrickSebast

Guest
If you sincerely believe that a person is going to be in Hell when they die wouldn’t the proper thing to do be extending their life as long as possible and making the effort to give them as many chances as to accept salvation? Is there some sort of theological reasoning to explain this beyond the death penalty being used at times in the Bible?
 
I do not assume that everyone who gets the death penalty is going to hell. Likewise, I do not assume that being in prison longer is directly correlated to salvation. Legally and ethically, I think it would be a mistake to incorporate a person’s religious convictions into the punishment phase of a trial.
 
there’s Fundamentalist “Catholics” that also approve of Death Penalty…I suppose the Holy Spirit hasn’t gotten to them yet 😉 God Bless!
 
I do not assume that everyone who gets the death penalty is going to hell. Likewise, I do not assume that being in prison longer is directly correlated to salvation. Legally and ethically, I think it would be a mistake to incorporate a person’s religious convictions into the punishment phase of a trial.
Natural Law outranks the law of the state…that is why abortion, euthanasia, and murder can never be justified
 
But the death penalty can be justified under certain circumstances, and it is in the Catechism of the Catholic Church promulgated by Pope John Paul II.
 
But the death penalty can be justified under certain circumstances, and it is in the Catechism of the Catholic Church promulgated by Pope John Paul II.
Catholic teachings on salvation are different, and the limitations on the death penalty are quite strict. Fundamentalism couldn’t use the same theology that the Church uses because they reject many of the things that lead into it.
 
Yeah, once saved always saved. So it doesn’t matter if you kill em.
 
Yeah, if they believe in once saved always saved or predestination then it wouldn’t really matter if you kill em or not.
 
If you sincerely believe that a person is going to be in Hell when they die wouldn’t the proper thing to do be extending their life as long as possible and making the effort to give them as many chances as to accept salvation? Is there some sort of theological reasoning to explain this beyond the death penalty being used at times in the Bible?
I’m not necessarily a fundamentalist Protestant, nor was the man who addresses the issue here. (CS Lewis).

angelfire.com/pro/lewiscs/humanitarian.html

If I may cherry-pick a few sentences that pertain most directly to the OP:

“I do not know whether a murderer is more likely to repent and make good on the gallows a few weeks after his trial or in the prison infirmary thirty years later.”

I agree with this; I don’t know if you can demonstrate that immanent death is more or less of a deterrent to justification than life in a cell and death of old age. With that in mind, there are other factors that explain why a Protestant might be supportive of capital punishment. In summary of the reasoning put forward by Lewis, the claims of the Humanitarian approach to justice are flawed in several ways, and while no system can ever be carried out infallibly at all times, a return to the more traditional philosophy of retribution would be more right and more just for all parties concerned.

Central to this argument is the concept of Desert. “The Humanitarian theory removes from Punishment the concept of Desert. But the concept of Desert is the only connecting link between punishment and justice. It is only as deserved or undeserved that a sentence can be just or unjust. I do not here contend that the question ‘Is it deserved?’ is the only one we can reasonably ask about a punishment. We may very properly ask whether it is likely to deter others and to reform the criminal. But neither of these two last questions is a question about justice.”

I suppose the thesis statement would be this: Protestants who support capital punishment do so because they believe it is more just than other alternatives, in the sense that some criminals deserve to die- and when this is true, the “concept of Desert” is the only connecting link between punishment and justice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top