How can we be modestly dressed when we are swimming

  • Thread starter Thread starter dumbseeker
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
“This is my argument too. I’m all for freedom. Let those who feel it’s inappropriate to dress that way or see others dress that way segregate themselves. And more importantly, they should not feel it’s their right to judge those Christian ladies who wear swim-wear they believe is immodest.”

"That’s my point also. There are some men who can control their lustful thoughts and some that either cannot or will not. "

That is humanism , not Christianity. The Bible means nothing to you and does in no way affect your decisions on morality.
That is fine but why not be honest about it.
 
The Bible tells us what proper dress is. It is sad you are a religious person instead of a Bible believing Christian.
 
And the preist and some cookies and wine and the confessional, and the Eucharist and some holy water and this and that.
People were condemned to the stake for this before Luther was born.
Until the V2 Catholics were strongly discouraged from reading the Bible and prohibited from questioning the Roman interpretation .
Keep to the thread title or create another thread. Pretty simple concept, really.
 
That is humanism , not Christianity. The Bible means nothing to you and does in no way affect your decisions on morality.
That is fine but why not be honest about it.
You have judged enough people for one day. No one came to your house today or yesterday and spoke so rudely to you like you have done here to us.
 
The Bible tells us what proper dress is. It is sad you are a religious person instead of a Bible believing Christian.
Do you speak this way to everybody you meet who doesn’t meet your expectations? You should be supporting your position *on the topic at hand *instead of hurling insults.
 
The Bible tells us what proper dress is. It is sad you are a religious person instead of a Bible believing Christian.
Frank… I am happy you are not a Catholic and neither then are the pastors whose errors you promote on this thread.

A Bible believing Christian you call your self… very well but if you have no guidance to read the Bible you can get anything out of it. Even the earliest fathers knew and recognised this fact.
… hehe…
the letter brings death, the Spirit gives life.
I see in Mystic Warrior a man who has been filled with the Spirit of wisdom and love… the Holy Spirit.
I will not cast judgement on you but it seems that you do not grasp the Spirit of the Word, even if you hold the Book in your hands. You are creating a law to enslave your brothers and sisters… just like the pharisees…
The Catholic Church has written, gathered and preserved the Bible for you, brother. The Word testifies to the Church. You cannot believe in the Bible and condemn your brethren in the same breath.
Pray for humility and wisdom… Let the Holy Spirit make you a child of God ready to listen at the Master’s feet.

Shalom.
 
{quote]T I disagree with the Protestants I really disagree with the Pentecostals but they are my brothers and sisters in Christ,. ,I disagree with the RCC but Catholics that accept Jesus as their savior and the only way to the Father are my brothers and sisters in Christ,
I
Frank, that just about says it all.

You have forsaken the assembly of the saints, living and dead.

On the topic at hand - I don’t think that you have problems with womens’ dress as much as you do with what’s under whatever they are wearing.

If you feel that a woman’s “womanliness” must be hidden, well that’s a different problem. To be modest a woman does not have to look like a blob in a skirt. God was pleased when he created woman, as was Adam. Don’t second guess them.
 
“This is my argument too. I’m all for freedom. Let those who feel it’s inappropriate to dress that way or see others dress that way segregate themselves. And more importantly, they should not feel it’s their right to judge those Christian ladies who wear swim-wear they believe is immodest.”

"That’s my point also. There are some men who can control their lustful thoughts and some that either cannot or will not. "

That is humanism , not Christianity. The Bible means nothing to you and does in no way affect your decisions on morality.
That is fine but why not be honest about it.
This is a good point. The posters here who are advocating indecent dress and swimwear for women are really embracing atheistic secularism and in no way do they reflect the teachings of Christianity, Islam or Judaism regarding modesty in dress.
 
BTW – if you are truly a modest person, do not take Topology as a mathematical discipline – you will soon discover that we are not truly “inside” our clothes, but more or less “adjacent” to them, thus mathematically the same as if we were walking down the street starkers with our kit under our arm. :eek:
:: Sporfle!!:: Geek humor, I loves it!!
 
Frank… I am happy you are not a Catholic and neither then are the pastors whose errors you promote on this thread.
And you thought I would never agree with you?, I would just as soon be a Hindu, which by the way one of you priests is. He is a RCC preist and a Hindu preist, that error is impressive!
A Bible believing Christian you call your self… very well but if you have no guidance to read the Bible you can get anything out of it. Even the earliest fathers knew and recognised this fact.
… hehe…
He he? Are you a child? The RCC father agreed to the Mat 16:18 nonsense for good reason, they disliked the idea of being cooked alive.
the letter brings death, the Spirit gives life.
I see in Mystic Warrior a man who has been filled with the Spirit of wisdom and love… the Holy Spirit.
Really? Are you a mystic too? Jesus Christ held all of scripture to be God breathed so you can follow Mystic Warrior and I will follow Christ.
I will not cast judgement on you but it seems that you do not grasp the Spirit of the Word, even if you hold the Book in your hands. You are creating a law to enslave your brothers and sisters… just like the pharisees…
Lol!! A Catholic who claims you must obey the changing laws of the men who run the church and claim Jesus was dead wrong on the authority of scripture and follows the pagans in thier belief in works salvation calling me an overly religious zealot? My my.
The Catholic Church has written, gathered and preserved the Bible for you, brother. The Word testifies to the Church. You cannot believe in the Bible and condemn your brethren in the same breath.
No they simply managed to con a few billion gullible into believing they did it for them. It is beyond words how dishonest it is to claim the RCC wrote the Bible and so blasphemous and so stupid.

2Pe 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation.
2Pe 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

Jesus never belittled Scripture (as some modern critics do), or set it aside (as the Jewish leaders of His day had done with their Oral Traditions), or criticized it (although He criticized those who misused it), or contradicted it (although He rejected many interpretations of it), or opposed it (although He sometimes was free or interpretive with it), nor spoke in any way as ‘higher’ critics do of the Old Testament (Tanakh).

The RCC outright says it is not true! If they wrote it like you say they are claiming they are liars, brilliant argument!

timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article574768.ece

From The Times
October 5, 2005
Catholic Church no longer swears by truth of the Bible
By Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent

“We should not expect to find in Scripture full scientific accuracy or complete historical precision,” they say in The Gift of Scripture.

But the first 11 chapters of Genesis, in which two different and at times conflicting stories of creation are told, are among those that this country’s Catholic bishops insist cannot be “historical”. At most, they say, they may contain “historical traces”.

Mar 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.
Mar 10:7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife;
Mar 10:8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.

The final word on this matter, however, should really be given to the Lord Jesus Christ Himself. In Matthew chapter 19, verses 4 and 5, the Lord is addressing the subject of marriage, and says: ‘Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?’

Notice how in the very same statement, Jesus refers to both Genesis 1 (verse 27b: ‘male and female created he them’) and Genesis 2 (verse 24: ‘Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh’). Obviously, by combining both in this way, He in no way regarded them as separate, contradictory accounts.

Jesus Christ treated Genesis as literal history and saw no conflict so it is a question of authority, mine is Jesus yours is an elected official.
Pray for humility and wisdom… Let the Holy Spirit make you a child of God ready to listen at the Master’s feet.
Who do you pray too after rejecting the God of the Bible ? Mary? The Pope?
 
And you thought I would never agree with you?, I would just as soon be a Hindu, which by the way one of you priests is. He is a RCC preist and a Hindu preist, that error is impressive!
It’s pretty clear that you can’t control yourself, Frank. On every thread you’ve been a part, you spew the same anti-Catholic rhetoric that has nothing to do with the topic.
He he? Are you a child? The RCC father agreed to the Mat 16:18 nonsense for good reason, they disliked the idea of being cooked alive.
She offered you an olive leaf, yet you treat your sister with disdain.
Really? Are you a mystic too? Jesus Christ held all of scripture to be God breathed so you can follow Mystic Warrior and I will follow Christ.
This is just shameful. You have no honor and no respect for a lady, nor for a Catholic. You’ve dishonored everyone you have spoken with on this forum. This tirade of insults doesn’t deserve a response from Grace. And you know why? Because she’s a lady. And because you are not a gentleman.

I’m from the South, as you undoubtedly are. And as such, you dishonor the Southern name and me. You dishonor the term “Southern hospitality”. And you dishonor the traditions of our forefathers, such as treating a lady with respect and giving them the honor they deserve, whether or not you agree with them. My father would have taken me to the “woodshed” for such behavior. It’s a shame you didn’t learn that growing up.

On top of that and most importantly, you dishonor Christ. He was kind to all who came to Him, saint or sinner. He was patient, kind and merciful. Yet, you hurl insults and condemn the very people that Christ loved and died for.

Apologize to her and everyone else you’ve disrespected here. If you don’t agree with them - fine. But, don’t treat people this way.
 
Frank, you are just a troll and should leave.

By the way, are you from Georgia?
 
I think this is what we are talking about. Flannel Pajama pants and a t-shirt are not revealing in any shape or form. You could trade it out for what girls of that age normally wear, tight jeans with their butt cracks hanging out and a tight top, and that woudl be more revealing. Really, boys at that age will fliip for a girl just becuase she has a pretty face and nice hair, theydont’ even have to see her body. What do you expect these girls to wear? Oversized sweatpants and a hoodie? A broom skirt and a t-shirt wtih a blazer? Seriously, boys will be boys and you can’t stop that, so you teach them control, but at the same time, you can’t say to the girls they need to cover their forearms becuase the boys are excitable. If we are really going to sit here and say that pajama pants and a t-shirt are bad, then the way I dress means that I’m outta luck. I wear pj pants and a t-shirt regularly to the movie store or to grab a late night snack somewhere, i guess i’m just a regular hooker
Beenwashed,

Your post is exactly what I was talking about :). Often times, women and/or girls really don’t really understand about boys or young men and their reactions. I can say as a 25 year old guy that some of what you have said is true, but some of it is simply not true, but you can’t be blamed because it’s what so many women believe for various reasons. I am trying to be helpful here by giving first hand, experiential knowledge about just how young men can react to these things.

This is very difficult to say in text only, because it can sound mean, but I assure you I mean nothing of the sort. I say this as kindly and good-naturedly as I possibly can: don’t just assume you know how men work, but listen to actual men giving their own experiences :). That’s the best way to understand and so make the best possible decision about things like modesty and so forth.

For example, the flannel pajamas… let me try to explain, although it will be hard to really get across the whole sense of it. First, as we know, and as has been said by some in this thread, associations make a huge difference. Now with flannel pajamas there is a very tempting association: girl’s sleep in their beds in these things. 🙂 Now I know that womens’ and mens’ minds work differently, so I will guess - from my experience with my female friends and from what I’ve read on the subject - that the average woman’s mind doesn’t see a friend in pajamas and necessarily even think of bed or sleeping - though just as I said to listen to men explain their experiences, I would welcome correction if I am mistaken. In any case, what I can tell you is that for many young men, when they see a girl in her pajamas the first thing that comes to mind - complete involuntarily - is sleeping, in bed, and so forth, and once the thought is in a young man’s mind, it can be very difficult to get out even with great effort and discipline. That’s one side of things.

Then there is another thing that I would suspect - though again I would welcome correction - most women don’t think about when they see pajamas: pajamas are often a lot thinner than denim, corduroy, khaki material, etc. When I was younger, and sometimes even now unfortunately, seeing a memeber of the opposite sex in pajamas even on television immediately called to mind the fact that there is nothing more than a layer of cloth between what I see and what’s underneath. Seeing someone in person called to mind immediately that there is nothing more than a layer of cloth between what I see and my touching what’s underneath. I can tell you that this isn’t just my experience, btw, but was shared by many of my fellow boys/men. It’s awful and perverse and corrupt, but it’s what pops into the mind of many - though not all - young men when they see these kinds of things, and its tought for even the devout to get out because of the power of the hormones and all that.

It is also, btw, very different from the reaction to jeans for example, or other sorts of pants. I am not sure how to explain it - maybe it doesn’t even make sense at all 🤷 - but jeans don’t inspire these kinds of thoughts, even in some cases tight ones. Jeans are more of a… well they’re a daytime, doing regular, non-sexual stuff sort of a thing to wear. Girls wear jeans to do math in school, and they wear jeans when they go to the football game, and they wear them to go shopping and to ride a roller-coaster… but flannel pajamas! 😛 Flannel pajamas are worn to bed. It sounds so silly, I know, and maybe perverse, but I’m just telling you how the young male mind works, unfortunate as it is. It’s the same thing, for example, for something like equestrian pants, which women wear when they ride horses, and I am sure you can imagine the sorts of thoughts that might bring to mind. Men don’t like it, or at least those fighting for purity don’t, but unfortunately that’s the nature of fallen man.

And the reality is I’m not even really beginning to express the real nature of this. It’s far more difficult than I can put into words in this limited space, or maybe into words at all.

So I will say again that it goes back to love of neighbor. Not all young men will suffer this difficulty, but many will, and I have no argument that it can seem like quite a burden for women and girls to worry about something as simple as wearing what seems like as objectively modest a thing like long flannel pants and a t-shirt. However, it is a small sacrifice of love for neighbor to be a tad - just a tad - more modest than might seem needful, for their sake.

God bless
 
This is a good point. The posters here who are advocating indecent dress and swimwear for women are really embracing atheistic secularism and in no way do they reflect the teachings of Christianity, Islam or Judaism regarding modesty in dress.
This is where the problem lies…
I have not seen one single advocate for immodesty on this thread, which may quite likely linked with the fact that this is a Christian forum.
If someone would actually come and advocate indecent clothes (and while doing so also offer a serious definition of what constitutes indecent clothes and why) I would be more than happy to take a debate against this person.
However… thus far the only indecency and immodesty I have encountered are in the few posters who condenm other people and project all kind of vileness into their neighbour without having any self criticism.
So maybe you can give me a few names of the ones who advocate indecency in clothes here so I know what we are up against besides the pharisaic pride and judgement that some of the brothers here display.

Shalom and peace.
 
Frank Cox; And you thought I would never agree with you?, I would just as soon be a Hindu, which by the way one of you priests is. He is a RCC preist and a Hindu preist, that error is impressive!

Grace: Well, thats fairly interesting, I give you that. So maybe you can give me the name of this “hindu priest” and enlighten us all.

He he? Are you a child? The RCC father agreed to the Mat 16:18 nonsense for good reason, they disliked the idea of being cooked alive.

Am I a child? I hope so.
Actually that is where you are wrong Frank. Let me start by saying I have been an Evangelical Christian most of my life and now I have come home to the Catholic Church which I have found to be truly apostolic. I am still one with my Evangelical brethren though - as they are with me… I dont assume you know anything about the unity of the Spirit, but this is what we have - but The Lord called me and told me that He wants me to eat His Body and Blood because He meant it literally what He spoke in John 6:20-50 (try to read it)
Faced with His invitation I looked into early Church history and I was shocked to find that the earliest church recorded was Catholic, both by name and practice. Both the apostles and their immediate followers died, crucified, stoned, cast to the wild beasts etc, for the Catholic faith. Not a Bible-alone faith… there was no such thing because the New Testament did not yet exist in the form we have it today.

Really? Are you a mystic too? Jesus Christ held all of scripture to be God breathed so you can follow Mystic Warrior and I will follow Christ.

What is a mystic to you? To me its a positive word meaning a man or woman who is so closely united to Christ that supernatural things occur in his/her life exteriorly. As such, most of us Christians are mystics at one time or the other. Some more than others, but mysticism does not define who is a better Christian.

Lol!! A Catholic who claims you must obey the changing laws of the men who run the church and claim Jesus was dead wrong on the authority of scripture and follows the pagans in thier belief in works salvation calling me an overly religious zealot? My my.

Brother, with all due respect. You have never studied what the Catholic Church actually believes, have you? What books have you read by serious Catholics?
I am not angry at you. You have good zeal but it needs to be directed by striving to know the Truth who is Christ so you receive the Spirit that was in Him. I kindly recommend you to read a small book called “By what Authority? an Evangelical becomes Catholic” by Mark Shea… He also used to stand in your shoes.

No they simply managed to con a few billion gullible into believing they did it for them. It is beyond words how dishonest it is to claim the RCC wrote the Bible and so blasphemous and so stupid.

Again… How do you define the content of the New Testament. Who has pointed out to you that this exact list of books is inspired where others are not???
For me the canon that we know has been made known through the Church. To claim otherwise is to go agaisnt logic. The Church was led by the Holy Spirit at the counsil at Carthago when the canon was finally defined in 382…by the same Spirit that was present and leading the first counsil in Jerusalem which we hear about in Acts.

Jesus never belittled Scripture (as some modern critics do), or set it aside (as the Jewish leaders of His day had done with their Oral Traditions), or criticized it (although He criticized those who misused it), or contradicted it (although He rejected many interpretations of it), or opposed it (although He sometimes was free or interpretive with it), nor spoke in any way as ‘higher’ critics do of the Old Testament (Tanakh).

Indeed. Christ was the one who truly understood Scripture and interpreted it with the full wisdom of the Spirit that had baptised Him. That Spirit He has given us so we dont run around like sheep without a shepherd, each with our own interpretation of reality.

The RCC outright says it is not true! If they wrote it like you say they are claiming they are liars, brilliant argument!

Scripture is the heart of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. There is has its right place… Only there its honored and understood rightly.
I do not say you dont honour the Word of God. But you limit the Living Word to the Bible, and that is wrong.
Some people suggested to me that the Evangelicals worship a book instead of the Lord.
I on the other hand have listened to hundreds of Evangelical sermons, songs, hymns, talks and had more conversations than I can count with Evangelical friends and family. I am not afraid to read the books of Luther, Calvin, the puritans, the modern pentecostals etc etc. I am not afraid of my brothers which is why I know what I am talking about while you stand in utter confusion and ignorantly back slander big parts of the Body of Christ. Repent from your error and come and eat with us at the table of the Holy Spirit.

Grace
 
Thank you to all who have participated. This thread is now closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top