blackforest
Well-known member
I love this article from the Archbishop of Baltimore! Especially on CAF, I’d love to see this conversation become less political and more theological.
Is it really? The words can be rearanged so it has no correlation to the group anyways.I have an issue with the group BLM, and at this point, it’s impossible to separate the two.
Really? I don’t understand that. (seriously; not being snarky)and at this point, it’s impossible to separate the two.
Sure would be more appropriate than some of the discussions that have gone on here.Especially on CAF, I’d love to see this conversation become less political and more theological.
Unfortunately, the movement is anything but theological. The article is an attempt to take back the BLM ideology from the political and social justice warriors who have become its mouthpiece.I’d love to see this conversation become less political and more theological.
Have you actually read the article ? Archbishop Lori explicitly states, I quote :BIG dif between the two that the Archbishop fails terribly to discern.
What Archbishop Lori is doing is precisely giving new meaning to the words “Black Lives Matter” from a Catholic point of view, not blindly condoning a Marxist – or anything else – agenda.At the outset, it is important to clarify that my efforts here are not intended to address, and certainly not to endorse, the specific political organization legally known as the BlackLivesMatter Global Network. Many ideological platforms and tactical strategies promoted under the umbrella of the phrase “Black Lives Matter” are in direct contradiction to church teaching and should rightfully be rejected by faithful Catholics.
Now I’m hearing Yoda say it.adamhovey1988:![]()
Is it really? The words can be rearanged so it has no correlation to the group anyways.I have an issue with the group BLM, and at this point, it’s impossible to separate the two.
Have you actually read the article ? Archbishop Lori explicitly states, I quote :
Yes I agree he’s attempting to separate the two aspects of the BLM movement. However, he’s trying to save the slogan BLM by attaching to it a sense of action and justification based upon the current state of affairs in the US.At the outset, it is important to clarify that my efforts here are not intended to address, and certainly not to endorse, the specific political organization legally known as the BlackLivesMatter Global Network. Many ideological platforms and tactical strategies promoted under the umbrella of the phrase “Black Lives Matter” are in direct contradiction to church teaching and should rightfully be rejected by faithful Catholics.
However, as many people have stated, BLM is not the rallying cry or even the umbrella by which we should all be under. There are those who are genuinely interested in combating the sins of racism and don’t share the Marxist ideology of BLM, but they may be misinformed as to what the organization behind BLM actually is. Therefore they endorse the slogan without giving any thought to what’s truly behind it.“To be sure, the words, “Black Lives Matter” mean different things to different people. Nonetheless, those same words should resonate with us as Catholics and indeed with all those who embrace the principles of Catholic social teaching. More than that, they should spur us on to action…”
Abp. Lori is trying to say that the slogan BLM is still justified because he’s separating the cause from the organization. That’s naïve, because the cause isn’t centered solely on black lives and if racism is to be combated, it needs to be combated for all ethnicities.
This is a good point. There are significant areas of the country where there are relatively few blacks, but a great many Latinos who are suffering similarly from prejudice, injustice, abuses by law enforcement etc. Also areas where the same thing is happening to indigenous people.if racism is to be combated, it needs to be combated for all ethnicities.
He’s attempting to validate BLM by drawing comparisons to the theological aspect of the church’s social justice beliefs.
He discerns it in the second paragraph:“Black lives matter” is a phrase, Archbishop. “ B lack L ives M atter” is NOT. BIG dif between the two that the Archbishop fails terribly to discern.
Many ideological platforms and tactical strategies promoted under the umbrella of the phrase “Black Lives Matter” are in direct contradiction to church teaching and should rightfully be rejected by faithful Catholics. Rather, the question before us as Catholics is this: Is there a truth reflected in these words that transcends partisan platforms and ideological constructs, a truth that indeed resonates with the Gospel values that flow from our faith?
He’s writing about Catholic Social Teaching, an indisputable, Magisterial teaching from our Church hierarchy that is directly intertwined with the salvation of souls.If he wants to show how we as Catholics can conquer racism, poverty and other evils of the world, he should have written about the necessity of a belief in Jesus Christ and the Catholic Church.