M
manualman
Guest
The problem with this line of reasoning should be obvious to any literate catholic not in a coma for the last 20 years! Do some research on the abuser priest scandal and you will very quickly find that many of the priests that molested countless preteen boys ALSO were widely respected in their larger community and in many cases were actively involved in ministries that clothed the poor, fed the hungry, sheltered the homeless…I’d say so when I see Christ’s words in Matt 25 where He says if they serve the hungry and those in need of clothing, they serve Him and are righteous and shall obtain eternal life.
Demonstrably, moral character is about BOTH doing good and refraining from evil. The moment you begin to allow the doing of good to compensate for the doing of evil, you have embarked on a path that leads to horror. Sin exists and it leads to VERY ugly things.
This quote of Jesus, as always, needs to be understood in context. Who was Jesus’ primary audience in his earthly ministry? Jews. Did Jews of the day typically err on the side of excessive avoidance of evil to the neglect of works of charity or excessive focus on works of charity to the neglect of discerning good from evil? Read the gospels and it should be pretty clear that it was the former. Jesus wasn’t telling them that evil acts made no difference, he was attempting to correct their imbalanced emphasis.