R
reen12
Guest
The CC teaches the value of redemptive suffering.
This is based, I assume, in Paul’s comment:
Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I am filling up what is lacking in the afflictions of Christ on behalf of his body, which is the church… [Col. 1:24]
Would an evangelical reject such a teaching - based on
the belief that Jesus has completed the work of our
salvation, and that no work of ours adds one iota,
in terms of one being saved?
If this is the case, how is unavoidable, profound suffering
viewed, theologically, in evangelicalism?
I would much appreciate help in understanding.
Thank you.
reen12
This is based, I assume, in Paul’s comment:
Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I am filling up what is lacking in the afflictions of Christ on behalf of his body, which is the church… [Col. 1:24]
Would an evangelical reject such a teaching - based on
the belief that Jesus has completed the work of our
salvation, and that no work of ours adds one iota,
in terms of one being saved?
If this is the case, how is unavoidable, profound suffering
viewed, theologically, in evangelicalism?
I would much appreciate help in understanding.
Thank you.
reen12