How do we please the lord without offending him

Status
Not open for further replies.
I reviewed an Examination of Conscience recently, and there is a huge number of mortal sins. There’s an equal number of venial sins, if not greater. How are supposed to please the Lord when some deed, word, or thought is going to offend him. God is perfect and it seems like imperfection offends him. I’m not disqualifying his mercy here, it just seems like everything we do is an offense.
 
WHAT I’M GOING TO SAY MAY, IN SOME OF ITS PARTS, STRIKE SOME AS OFFENSIVE, BUT IT’S MY INTERPRETATION FROM WHAT I’VE LEARNED FROM THE SOURCES OF OUR TRADITION (Sacraments, Scripture, Liturgies, Creeds, Ecumenical Councils, Fathers, etc):

We know that, as Catholics, we are Members of the same Body, the Body of Christ, the Church. We can, in light of this primarily Pauline understanding, conclude that committing any sins in regards to the Ten Commandments (which are still offered today for examinations of conscience in preparation for Confession) rips apart the Communion that is this Body. If you deny God by apostasy through the worship of occult practices of idolatry, deny him by invoking His Name and making false oaths, avoid coming to the Sacraments, then you forfeit life in Christ and break apart the Church through scandal and denying both God and others. This is the first tablet of the Commandments. If you reject your Christian parents, denying them the support they need, if you murder other Christians, if you break apart Christian marriages, kidnap family members of other Christians or steal from them to so great an extent that they are in want, bear false witness against other Christians to get them arrested, tried, sued, or executed, as well as covet their belongings (coveting being a sinister and deliberately planned firm resolution to take what does not belong to you, out of honour, greed, and envy), then you also rip apart the Body of Christ. We are not free, however, to treat non-Christians in any like manner since then we would fail in being “a light to the nations,” keep people from receiving the Gift of Faith, and also merit the fulfilment of natural death which is hell.

THEREFORE, mortal sin is “ripping the Body apart, and denying God who is the Body,” and this can only be healed when Church Authorities deal with the matter, casting out those who cause this, or providing the healing means whereby the offender is reintegrated within the Body after repentance and through Confession. Only sins that actually destroy the unity between Members of the Church in a real and visible way (coveting being the only exception) are truly mortal sins. Venial sins do this, too, but not to so great an extent with such dire consequences. What I’m saying is simple: mortal sin must be understood in a communal context with God and neighbour in a family covenantal understanding. Mortal sin is not the breaking of “rules” created before time began. Also, mortal sin is not natural law oriented in terms of philosophy, nor can it be a personal, hidden, sin that actually does not affect the Body like coveting would. Personal, hidden sins, apart from coveting, are still dangerous since they may weaken us to be open to committing mortal sin, but they are only venial. A mortal sin not only destroys the Body that is the Church but also requires Divine Intervention through the actions of the bishop, who casts out but also reintegrates the offender.

In the Old Covenant, the people were commanded to be, starting with Adam, Temple Builders…to bring the Presence of God, after the first sin, in a limited way, to the rest of the world, and to all people. But this was fulfilled in the Chosen Seed, the Seed of the Woman, Christ Himself, the final and true Temple Builder, resurrected in the Spirit! Furthermore, while the 10 Commandments are still binding, and the secondary penitential symbolic laws of the Mosaic Covenant no longer are, there was a real sense in which the Old Covenant people were in slavery to God. But we are no longer slaves, but Children of God, Heirs, Co-Redeemers, and Friends. Jesus, in fact, says “I no longer call you slaves, but friends” (paraphrased) in John’s Gospel.
 
Now, we have statements within the sources of Tradition, primarily from the monastic spirituality of the Fathers, that we must be “worthy” to approach to receive the Eucharist. But these sources are lower sources than actual Sacramental and Biblical sources. Authorities within the Tradition derive this from 1 Corinthians 11. But, in truth, their interpretation does not match the literal sense of the passage. According to Paul’s context therein, the way we treat the Body of Christ, the Members of the Church, is the way we treat the Eucharistic Body and Blood of Jesus, since the Eucharist is what makes us His Body. The Eucharist is the Unity/Peace Offering of the New Covenant. Therefore, Paul would be saying that you could not receive the Eucharist for two reasons: 1) you don’t actually believe that the Eucharist is truly Jesus, and, by extension, you deny the reality of the Church, or 2) you have so divided the Church that you have shown contempt for God through his Body, and, obviously wouldn’t be welcomed at the Liturgical Celebration of that Body, without causing evil and disorder in his Presence.

Later on, in Church history, we get further understanding of the difference between anathema, excommunication, and mortal sin, but, in my opinion, for the early Church, these were the same reality. An example of mortal sin/excommunication/anathema in the Scriptures occurs within 1 Corinthians, were Paul casts out the man who slept with his own mother (the Christian wife of his Christian father). This was bad not only because she was his mother, but also because Roman Law would penalize this with death, and such a legal investigation would, furthermore, slander the Christian Church and put them also to death. The offender would be guilty of bearing false witness, a mortal sin. From here, we can go further into early Church history. From what I’ve learned, within the early Church, Christians would confess their sins to each other and then receive Eucharist, like we do within the penitential part of the beginning of the Mass. Of the little we know, they only had to go for official confession to the bishop when they committed three sins for which they were cast out of the Church: murder, adultery, and apostasy. What happened to general, communal confession, is a separate topic, but, when we look at these three sins, in accordance to the Church being Living Stones working together and Members of the same Body, we can conclude that these three sins mentioned clearly destroy and divide that one Body, and all three of them are found within the 10 Commandments, making the 10 Commandments, again, our authoritative guide on how to avoid mortal sin.
 
Just remember that, while the official teaching of mortal and venial sins has been settled infallibly, the only infallible list of which sins are mortal is the 10 Commandments (I find that, often, examinations of conscience go too far, relating these simple 10 Commandments to a whole host of many more sins). For a sin to be mortal it must be one that breaks the 10 Commandments, or any other sins that can destroy the Body or deny God to so great an extent as breaking one of the 10 Commandments, as well as be deliberately done with full knowledge that it is a mortal sin in the first place.

And remember that, if you only committed a venial sin (which is discerned in light of the fact that you haven’t totally denied God or used the occult, and haven’t ripped apart the Body of Christ, the Church, to so great an extent, OR, even if you did do the above to a great extent, but not deliberately and with full knowledge), you can still go ahead and receive the Eucharist. Confession for venial sins, however, is wonderful!

Be at peace, my brother or sister! God knows that you can’t be as perfect as Him (“perfect” in Matthew 5:48 doesn’t actually mean, in its literal sense, according to the Greek, as well as from here in association with Old Testament ideas and passages, what most people assume it means). You can’t earn salvation. It’s God’s Gift of his Grace…all you have to do is cooperate with it to the best of your ability, and avoid breaking the 10 Commandments, or anything that would deny God or rip apart the Church to so great an extent.
 
Oh yeah, I have to clarify something. Within my posts, I put so much emphasis on the bishop, instead of the priest, because 1) in the early Church it was the bishop who heard confession, and 2) even nowadays, a priest’s ability to offer the Eucharist and hear Confessions is only because these faculties have been given to him by the bishop.
 
I reviewed an Examination of Conscience recently, and there is a huge number of mortal sins. There’s an equal number of venial sins, if not greater. How are supposed to please the Lord when some deed, word, or thought is going to offend him. God is perfect and it seems like imperfection offends him. I’m not disqualifying his mercy here, it just seems like everything we do is an offense.
Love your neighbor as yourself. Go out and help the poor. No one is perfect or sinless. If God demanded perfection none of us would make it to heaven. God loves us as you are, continue to improve but don’t overthink
 
I reviewed an Examination of Conscience recently, and there is a huge number of mortal sins. There’s an equal number of venial sins, if not greater. How are supposed to please the Lord when some deed, word, or thought is going to offend him. God is perfect and it seems like imperfection offends him. I’m not disqualifying his mercy here, it just seems like everything we do is an offense.
If you suffer from scrupulousity, as you seem to, you should ask a good priest for help.

A few months ago, I read an Exam of Con. which said it was sinful not to privately pray a *particular *set of prayers: which is out and out wrong. We are not all called to pray privately the same set of prayers; I can only assume that in the copying of this E/C they left out the part that it is for people under some type of vow to pray those prayers.

Until you find a good priest to help you, keep it simple: did you go to Mass or want to but were blocked by illness, work, or something out of your control? Did you say something blasphemous *on purpose *, not when you broke your toes out of habit and thus by mistake? Did you abandon your parents to starve? Did you kill anyone because you hated them? Etc. Keep it simple!

It helps me to end my recitation of sins in Confession by saying “For these and all the sins of my past life, I am most heartily sorry.” Then I know for sure that all my sins are covered by my Confession except mortal sins which I *deliberately, on purpose *leave out.
 
If you suffer from scrupulousity, as you seem to, you should ask a good priest for help.

A few months ago, I read an Exam of Con. which said it was sinful not to privately pray a *particular *set of prayers: which is out and out wrong. We are not all called to pray privately the same set of prayers; I can only assume that in the copying of this E/C they left out the part that it is for people under some type of vow to pray those prayers.

Until you find a good priest to help you, keep it simple: did you go to Mass or want to but were blocked by illness, work, or something out of your control? Did you say something blasphemous *on purpose *, not when you broke your toes out of habit and thus by mistake? Did you abandon your parents to starve? Did you kill anyone because you hated them? Etc. Keep it simple!

It helps me to end my recitation of sins in Confession by saying “For these and all the sins of my past life, I am most heartily sorry.” Then I know for sure that all my sins are covered by my Confession except mortal sins which I *deliberately, on purpose *leave out.
THIS^^^
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top