How do you personally use fine tuning in discussion?

[Maximus_Power]

Hello. I’m a practicing Catholic, and I uphold the laws and teaching of the Church as best a sinner can. I’m frequently challenged or I inquired to my faith and life choices.
I mostly just use the arguments from contingency, and it totally works, but I’m tired of sounding like a broken record and would like fresh material.

I’ve read the fine tuning arguments In Trent Horns book Answering Athiesm, and while I find them convincing I don’t find them easy to memorize, or use them in a casual conversation.

How have you personally used the fine tuning arguments?

How do you bring them up?

Can you simplify them?

 

[ASC]

I heard it explained once with an analogy that went something like this: if you set a monkey behind a typewriter, you won’t return to find that he’s transcribed Shakespeare’s plays, word for word, no mistakes! The odds of that happening are insane! Those same odds more or less represent the probability of the world’s being, randomly, the way it is.