In a discussion with a Mormon once, he quoted the bible verse that says ‘you must all be perfect, as the heavenly father is perfect.’ His point was that we could become gods.
My response was that “I think that verse refers to moral perfection, not ontological perfection.” Only God is, or can be, ontologically perfect.
Ontological refers to that which pertains to being. I would expand that to say that it means, that which pertains to the essence of a being.
Ontologically my “being-ness” is to be human. I can never be ontologically perfect because I can never possess the perfections which pertain only to the divine nature–the attributes of God, each of which not only pertains to His nature but is identical with it.
But my beingness or nature is different than that of a dog or a parrot or an amoeba or an angel. We are talking about attributes which go to the essence of one’s nature.
Good definitions. I don’t know that I can improve upon them, but I just had to post something in a thread that uses the word “ontological” in the title!
I particularly like St. Anselm’s ontological argument for the existence of God!
DISCLAIMER: Catholic Answers has turned over the archive to Catholic-Questions.org and no longer owns, manages, or moderates the forums. For additional apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.