A
adawgj
Guest
How do you read the Catechism of the Catholic Church?
Carefully. Very carefully.How do you read the Catechism of the Catholic Church?
As for reading; the most recent and BY FAR easiest to read and understand is the ***“UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CATECHISM FOR ADULTS” ***written for the laity. The Other Catechism were primarily intended for Teachers of the Faith; Bishops, Priest, Religios and trained Laity.=adawgj;11861510]How do you read the Catechism of the Catholic Church?
I agree, this is s great text. Lots of references, even from saints. Also a mditation and study questions.As for reading; the most recent and BY FAR easiest to read and understand is the ***“UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CATECHISM FOR ADULTS” ***written for the laity. The Other Catechism were primarily intended for Teachers of the Faith; Bishops, Priest, Religios and trained Laity.
As for understanding it. While it often quotes the bible and other sources; it’s primary liteary style is “literal.” The authors have tried to remove as much mystery as possible.
God Bless you,
Patrick
Similarly…with a nun who wears a habitCarefully. Very carefully.
![]()
Start with “Practical Directions For Using This Catechism”How do you read the Catechism of the Catholic Church?
CCC, 1735 has to be coupled with the word voluntary in CCC 1734 which you have above. The cross-reference in the margin, CCC, 1804 also must be applied. Is engaging in a same-sex act voluntary? Was there a plan to be in the same place as the “partner”? If one or more factors in CCC, 1735 are in play than the voluntary aspect is reduced, etc. These are general considerations since I am not qualified to make an exact judgment call. When in doubt, the person should talk with the priest in confession or in an appointment for counseling by someone qualified. Same-sex attraction problems will not be a surprise.I have raised the question of how to interpret paragraph 1735 of the catechism, which says that under some circumstances, a gravely evil action may not necessarily be a mortal sin, requiring confession.
leads to “the slavery of sin.”28 (1803)
1734 Freedom makes man responsible for his acts to the extent that they are voluntary. Progress in virtue, knowledge of the good, and ascesis enhance the mastery of the will over its acts. (1036, 1804)
1735 Imputability and responsibility for an action can be diminished or even nullified by ignorance, inadvertence, duress, fear, habit, inordinate attachments, and other psychological or social factors. (597)
MY QUESTION is, suppose I feel that my action falls under 1735. In other words, if I didn’t have this habit or irrational attraction to something, I probably wouldn’t be doing this otherwise gravely evil thing. For example, suppose someone has a same-sex attraction. Wouldn’t that be a “psychological factor” that reduces the imputabillity of responsibility for engaging in a same-sex act?
If 1735 does not apply to that situation, then what can 1735 possibly mean?