How incredibly sad is this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NetNuncio
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

NetNuncio

Guest
cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=38528

Call for state control of religion in Canada

Ottawa, Jul. 20 (LifesiteNews.com/CWN) - As Canada’s Senate approaches the final vote on the gay marriage bill C-38, the country’s national public radio, CBC Radio, has aired a commentary by a retired professor from the Royal Military College calling for state control over religion, specifically Catholicism. While parliamentarians dismissed warnings by numerous religious leaders and experts that the same-sex marriage law would lead to religious persecution, former professor Bob Ferguson has called for “legislation to regulate the practice of religion.”

“Given the inertia of the Catholic Church, perhaps we could encourage reform by changing the environment in which all religions operate,” Ferguson began his commentary on Monday. "Couldn’t we insist that human rights, employment, and consumer legislation apply to them as it does other organizations? Then it would be illegal to require a particular marital status as a condition of employment or to exclude women from the priesthood. "

Ferguson continued, “Of course the Vatican wouldn’t like the changes, but they would come to accept them in time as a fact of life in Canada. Indeed I suspect many clergy would welcome the external pressure.”

The former professor pitched his idea as a boon to religious freedom. “We could also help the general cause of religious freedom by introducing a code of moral practice for religions,” he said. “They will never achieve unity so why not try for compatibility? Can’t religious leaders agree to adjust doctrine so all religions can operate within the code?”

Ferguson also suggested “obvious” prohibitions on religion including preaching of “hate.” “I won’t try to propose what might be in the new code except for a few obvious things: A key item would have to be a ban on claims of exclusivity. It should be unethical for any RRP (registered religious practitioner) to claim that theirs was the one true religion and believers in anything else or nothing were doomed to fire and brimstone. One might also expect prohibition of ritual circumcisions, bans on preaching hate or violence, the regulation of faith healers, protocols for missionary work, etc.,” said Ferguson. The retired professor concluded his comments saying, “Now what is the point of proposing this? I do it because I am worried that the separation between church and state is under threat. Religion is important in our lives, but it can become a danger to society when people claim that the unalterable will of God is the basis for their opinions and actions. Yes religion can be a comfort and a guide, but we cannot take rules from our holy books and apply them to the modern world without democratic debate and due regard for the law.”
 
It’s not sad, it’s outrageous. If I were a Canadian, I’d turn the tables on this jerk and charge him with violating Canada’s hate speech laws.
 
That’s one radio broadcaster who should be ridden out of town on a rail. He mentions the “inertia” of the Catholic Church – well, I think it’s time for Canadian Catholics to show just how active the Church can be.

“RRP”? “Registered Religious Practitioner”? Is he for real? :bigyikes:

Crazy Internet Junkie Society
****Carrier of the Angelic Sparkles Sprinkle Bag
 
The more I read and/or hear people bad mouth the Catholic Church the stornger my Faith becomes and in the end all Catholics will be in Heaven defending it from evil. 👍
 
I think I have enough feathers in my pillow. Could someone lend me some tar?

Thank God for the American free exercise clause!
 
40.png
NetNuncio:
The retired professor concluded his comments saying, “Now what is the point of proposing this? I do it because I am worried that the separation between church and state is under threat.”
Aha! What he really means is that the state is under threat. The state cannot tolerate any genuine challenge to its arrogant and delusional claims of ultimate authority and ownership.

The real solution is to abolish the state.

Religions cause all these problems, and the state is going to rescue us? The same way Hitler rescued the Germans? The same way Lenin rescued the Russian workers? The same way Bush is rescuing Iraq?

How deluded can these people be?
 
40.png
NetNuncio:
The retired professor concluded his comments saying, “Now what is the point of proposing this? I do it because I am worried that the separation between church and state is under threat. Religion is important in our lives, but it can become a danger to society when people claim that the unalterable will of God is the basis for their opinions and actions. Yes religion can be a comfort and a guide, but we cannot take rules from our holy books and apply them to the modern world without democratic debate and due regard for the law.”
Something doesn’t sound right here, in the way most everyone is taking this guy. I’m not sure we’re cheering for the right team.

I don’t know this guy but it sounds to me that he is using satire to make a point. As Rush Limbaugh says, “illustrating absurdity by being absurd.”

With no other context than this article, I think he’s trying to scare people into realizing how crucial it is that the Church and state governments do stay autonomous.

:rotfl:

A code of moral ethics to tell religions what to do? The Vatican would come to accept the changes? Clergy would appreciate the outside pressure? Force the Church to allow women and married men to become priests? adjust their doctrines? Come on, how obvious does it have to get? 👋

This guy’s yanking our chains. He’s speaking along with other leaders against gay marriage, among secular pointy headed academics who are not listening to Church leaders that gay marriage will cause religious persecution. This guy is pretending to be one of them, but instead has presented himself of a horrible characature of the parliament members he’s insulting. He has set up a straw man, and gotten it right by many people. Not good enough for ol’ read-between-the-lines AlanFrom Wichita. Yeeeeehaaa. 👍

Alan

P.S. or I could be totally wrong. Have a nice day. 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top