T
TreeHugger
Guest
I took this idea from another person…i know we all come from different backgrounds, and i’m curious what you all think.
I grew up in the reverse- there were 5 girls and 2 boys. Actually since you weren’t counting yourself, you actually have one more sibling. However, when I was having children it did influence me to have at least a medium size family. I know how much fun we have had over the years being a large family. We are now ranging from 47 to 62 and we are all very close and I can’t imagine not having all of them. I ended up with 4 children and they are happy to have each other. It is a comfort in many circumstances. I don’t consider 4 a large family, my children do.I have 5 brothers and 2 sisters. I like having a large family, I couldn’t see having a smaller family.
Yeh I see what your saying. I have a brother who has four children and when his wife was pregnant with the 4th people would give her dirty looks, like “haven’t you had enough?”We have 5 children and everyone else seems to be so astonished by this. I don’t see us as a large family at all. Both my parents came from families with 4 children and back then (40’s & 50’s) it was so normal. I came from 3 and my husband 4, so I never thought 5 was so many, but society has deemed it that way. You should see (outside of church) the dirty looks we can get when out in public! Personally, I would agree that more than six would be a large family. However, society has put a different spin on this matter.
Thats about the difference between the oldest and youngest in my dads family. My dad is 21 years older than his sister. It would feel weird graduating college when your sister is born.I was the oldest of 7, there is 22 years between me and the youngest. I, myself have only 3, I would have love to have more but unable to. In today’s world people seem to think more than two is to much. I don’t think so.