S
Seaborgium
Guest
My priest has an Iphone, it may have been a gift, but the maintenance charges/rates are high to make full use of its functionality, wifi etc.
Given the availability Priests maintain, this could well be a parish expense. We have one priest in a very large parish. It is amazing how quickly he responds to voicemail or texts by iPhone. He can even be followed on things like twitter for some events.Diocesan priests do not make a promise of poverty, only of celibacy and obedience to his bishop. Diocesan Priests are encouraged to live a simple lifestyle (nothing overtly “flashy”).
I believe a cell phone is fairly “standard” for most Americans today so I don’t see a priest having one as something unusual.
Our parish priest would consider himself wealthy to receive that sum of money. I am ashamed to type that, our parish accounts year on year, show that our priest had less to live on than someone receiving unemployment benefit. We seem to expect that our (and God’s) servant to attend to our needs constantly, yet we barely give him enough to survive on. I reckon our finances would slowly move closer to the black if each of us who could, gave the cost of a movie seat each week. But as our priest said, there are people who are blessed with good finances, but not with giving.In the United States, around $30,000.
And, to be honest, I would not consider a smartphone to be a luxury for someone who has a full calendar of meetings, a large group of contacts, and needs to be reachable in case of emergency, but either call or textPriests could make much more money if they were the laity, so lets not grudge them some luxuries.
Thoroughly debunked conservative garbage. Save it for FOX Nation.My friend, millions of people have gotten multiple free smartphones through the “Obamaphone” program. Didn’t you know that? You are paying for it.
Thank you so much for your empathy. Yes, most of our priests suffer many things silently - our future saints.As someone new to Catholicism, it has been amazing to see just a tiny part of what our priest does (always willingly, and with a big smile on his face). He’s also an only priest in a busy parish, and I know he suffers from severe neck and back pain - yet to see how he rushes around, cycling through the town, never too busy to fit someone in - he’s a great example.
Yesterday, when he was lying prostrate on the hard stone, I thought how much pain he must have been in. Similarly, later in the service he supported the large, heavy crucifix whilst people came up to kiss it - it took about half an hour for everyone to file past and he had his arms outstretched for most of that time.
Certainly it shows what the word “vocation” really means in practice. I admire him and others who give so much for very little material recompense.
Thanks!!Thoroughly debunked conservative garbage. Save it for FOX Nation.
snopes.com/politics/taxes/cellphone.asp
As for the original question: how much are priests paid? Not enough.
Seriously, my former pastor, who I knew very well personally, was one of the busiest people I have ever met and was responsible for a large parish (7,000+) virtually by himself. We had no other permanent priest, although on occasion others would help. There were, of course, other staff including myself; however, there are many things that only the priest can do.
Nope, not debunked at all. It is a fact that millions have received smartphones from the government program. I work in social services and see them every day. Even the US government admits that at least 270,000 people received multiple free phones.Thoroughly debunked conservative garbage. Save it for FOX Nation.
Yes, that’ true. But it’s not an “Obamaphone.” The program began in 1984, so it’s a “Reagen phone,” if it’s anything. And it’s not paid for by taxpayers but by fees levied against telecom companies, which may or may not pass these fees onto its users.Nope, not debunked at all. It is a fact that millions have received smartphones from the government program. I work in social services and see them every day. Even the US government admits that at least 270,000 people received multiple free phones.
hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312210A1.pdf
Why would you even want to deny this?
Yes, I agree. I’m a republican and would never vote for Obama and I couldn’t agree more. He gets blamed for everything from one side and praised for everything from the other. It is getting old. He’s not responsible for everything–good, bad, or anything else.Yes, that’ true. But it’s not an “Obamaphone.” The program began in 1984, so it’s a “Reagen phone,” if it’s anything. And it’s not paid for by taxpayers but by fees levied against telecom companies, which may or may not pass these fees onto its users.
It gets very old to see so many threads turn into slams, mostly untrue, against the President, even when they have nothing to do with him. And doubly repugnant when they’re promulgated by posters who profess to be practicing Catholics and quick to point out and deplore the sins of others.
A true man of GodAs someone new to Catholicism, it has been amazing to see just a tiny part of what our priest does (always willingly, and with a big smile on his face). He’s also an only priest in a busy parish, and I know he suffers from severe neck and back pain - yet to see how he rushes around, cycling through the town, never too busy to fit someone in - he’s a great example.
Yesterday, when he was lying prostrate on the hard stone, I thought how much pain he must have been in. Similarly, later in the service he supported the large, heavy crucifix whilst people came up to kiss it - it took about half an hour for everyone to file past and he had his arms outstretched for most of that time.
Certainly it shows what the word “vocation” really means in practice. I admire him and others who give so much for very little material recompense.