How to answer these anti catholic points?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FireFromHeaven
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I would just introduce them to the concept of a “straw man” haha. Or just the concept of a lie on many of them…
 
This link has the most complete list of doctrines seen by non Catholics as false. Please give arguements to be used when these are brought up in conversation.

bible.ca/cath-overview-false-teaching.htm
Get a copy of Karl Keating’s book…Catholicism and Fundamentalism: The Attack on “Romanism” by “Bible Christians”

amazon.com/Catholicism-Fundamentalism-Attack-Romanism-Christians/dp/0898701775

Just on the first issue…calling no man father…ask them what they call their fathers? Is the passage to be taken literally and absolute?

fisheaters.com/callingmenfather.html

You could look at this site too: www.scripturecatholic.com
 
Fire,
Please reference the tracts section of CA for some very good rebuttals against many of the objections listed on the site referenced. Most objections listed are misrepresentations of actual Catholic doctrine.
The website’s author, Steve Rudd, really has some strange notions about the Catholic faith that rate right up there with those of Lorraine Bottener.🤷
 
Can I just say that website is totally hilarious? Did this guy bother to read the Catechism?:rotfl:

On another level, such intense misunderstanding and dislike is very saddening. I hope you find what you’re looking for, OP. Catholic Answers is a great place to start.
 
This link has the most complete list of doctrines seen by non Catholics as false. Please give arguements to be used when these are brought up in conversation.

bible.ca/cath-overview-false-teaching.htm
Rather than arguing with people about the details, show them kindness and great love. Enjoy your faith life, and be confident that God loves you so much that He not only died for your sins, but gave you a Church and comes to be with you every day at Mass.

That will be your most effective argument. 🙂

Of course, ensure that you yourself are properly catechized, so that if people have real questions (not just straw men that they want to throw out there to tie you up in knots) you can answer them confidently - for example, “Why do you have to go to Mass every Sunday?” and “What’s that thing where you scratch your forehead just before the Gospel?” and things like that. 🙂
 
Every single one of these issues has a great rebuttal. As a college student years ago, I worked through all of these challenges Rudd raises. Keating’s book was a great start. CAF will fill in any gaps.
 
This link has the most complete list of doctrines seen by non Catholics as false. Please give arguements to be used when these are brought up in conversation.
Sure thing:

1. Calling the Priests “Father” is forbidden

Unlike english, hebrew, aramaic, and greek have multiple words for “father”. The word Jesus tells us NOT to use for ANY man (not even our own biological fathers) is Abba. Abba is a greek and aramaic combination of the greek title “ba” (for dad) and the aramaic honorific A-, which turns the title of ba into a proper name. In other words, Abba is NOT the title of a father, but rather is a NAME which means THE Father.

Why the warning? Because Caesar at this point had declared his divinity, claiming to be a partial God and therefore demanding that the subjugated jews reference him as “Abba Caesar”, which would have been calling Caesar by one of God’s names.

Counter point: Paul calls himself the spiritual father of MANY of the people he writes to, and often refers to FATHER Abraham as a spiritual father as well. In this context, there is NO WAY to understand that Christ meant that we can never use the english title of father to refer to anyone at all…

2. Praying repetitive words using Rosary beads is forbidden.

Matthew 6:7 ACTUALLY says that we are not to babble incoherently like the pagans who believe that God can be MADE to do their will because of their many words. The rosary is NOT a prayer held in the words said. Rather the rosary is a contemplative prayer, a meditation on the life of Christ through the sacred mysteries of the life and passion. The words are NOT there to make God listen to us, but rather to serve as a means by which we are given time and space to focus on our own devotion to Christ’s life and it’s key events/mysteries. The beads are merely a counting tool, because trying to COUNT while trying to meditate on the life of Christ would be very difficult.

3. Virgin Mary

Let’s start with asking if Mary had other sons and look at the “proof” of Matthew 13. Let’s assume that Jews only had 100 different male names at the time (we know there were many more than that). The probability that a random brother of Christ would share the same name of one of his disciples at this point is 12/100. That would be unlikely, but a believable coincidence. However, the four “brothers” named are EXACTLY the same four names as four of Jesus’ disciples. Let’s consider that the combined probability of multiple events is the product of multiplying the probability of all four events separately. This means that the probability is 12^4/100^4… so the probability that is 81/390625… those are pretty desparate odds… any gambler can tell you that you should NOT bet that these four were biological brothers based on this statistic (and because the Jews had more than 100 male names, the odds are even worse in reality). The odds say that the brothers referenced are ACTUALLY the disciples of Christ who happened to be there at the time.

So how do we know Mary was eternally a virgin? Because she has to be according to Isaiah, who gives prophecy that the King of Israel (Christ) will enter through the king’s door (Mary’s womb), and that NO ONE but the king will be allowed to pass through this door… ever.

4. Every Christian drinks of the communion cup

It is a false claim that we are forbidden to drink from the Cup. However, it should be noted that since Christ’s nature is inseparable, to eat only the species of bread is still to receive the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ in fullness.

Let’s look at their scriptural evidence: Matthew 26:27 is a comission to the apostles (and their successors), not to all men. 1 Cor 11 is warning against communion where each person brings their own bread and wine (if they can afford it) and offers it singly rather than as a community. As such, the poor were excluded from communion. Paul’s caution here is that they need to be making a community offering because the Eucharist is our sign of unity… and that the poor should not be excluded. It is NOT mandating that we MUST drink from the chalice at all masses.

5. All Christians are saints

The church teaches that all Christians are indeed saints, and that we hope to be sanctified and to become Saints (not the difference in capitolization).

6. All Christians are priests

The church teaches that all people share in the universal priesthood through Christ’s death and resurrection. The modern word for priest comes from the greek presbyteros, which is a specific title of ordination given in the new testament (in other words, priests fill a special ORDAINED office of priesthood as presbyters).

To be continued…
 
… continued
7. Bishops must be Married.


Ludicrous. 1 Tim 3 indicates that a bishop, if married, must only be the husband of one wife, but it does NOT say that a Bishop MUST have been married and had children. There is no evidence that Bishop St Paul HIMSELF was married either. In fact, we know that at the point that he wrote the epistles, he was NOT married.

Furethermore, no one is forbidden to marry. If one feels called to marriage they do not HAVE to become a priest… or if they feel called to be priest who is married, they may be ordained in any of the Eastern rites, which allow it. The Catholic church has THOUSANDS of married priests.

8. Peter was married

Celibacy is a discipline. St Peter married because that discipline (which is for the good of the church) was NOT in place at that time.

9. Latin Mass forbidden

At the time the latin mass was in place, many people understood or spoke latin. All homilies were delivered in vernacular, and translations were available to people. The bible never forbids latin, it warns against incomprehensibility… something that was not a problem while the majority of the western world was familiar with latin.

10. Observance of special days condemned

Galatians was written to the Gauls, former pagans. The warning in Gal 4 is not to fall back into observances for pagan seasonal “gods” and add that into Christianity. It has nothing to do with Christian observances.

11. Worshipping idols, icons and images violates the 2nd commandment.

That’s good, because the church teaches that false idol worship is a mortal sin.

12. Baptism is full immersion in water, not sprinkling

The bible says nothing about the means of baptism, only that one must be baptised (through the water and the Spirit). The church is given the authority to determine applicable means when Christ tells the Apostles “whatsoever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven… He who hears you, hears me.”

Can babies be baptised? Sure. The stricture is that to be saved one must believe AND be baptised. This is falsely interpeted in this document to mean ONE event. It is not. Believing and baptising are two different things. God’s saving grace, imparted initially through baptism, is a free gift and requires NO act or statement on the part of the believer. The DISCIPLINE, however, to ensure that a person does not commit sacrilage, is that persons who are old enough to have attained the age of reason, should INDICATE their belief before being baptised.

13. Original sin is false doctrine

Original sin refers to the fallen nature of man, and not to personal sin. This objection is built around the fact that the author of this page had NO IDEA what Catholic teaching on original sin means (unless he means to argue that we did NOT receive a fallen nature from Adam and Eve’s actions and that God created us as flawed and sinful… which would be blasphemy).

14. Every Christian can understand the Bible by merely read it.

Ephesians 3 does NOT argue for inerrancy of private interpretation. If you read the chapter you will quickly find that what Paul says through verse 6 is that by reading his epistles the singular mystery (not all mysteries) that they will understand is that the Gentiles are now redeemed too. He NEVER says that their private interpretation will be without error.

15. Catholics are unwilling to defend their faith

The existance of this forum proves this point wrong.

16. Human tradition and man made doctrine is apostasy

Their argument is that the pope thinks he can “change” scripture. This is not true. Scripture has been magisterially declared as universal, eternal, and true. No man can change it. No dogma can EVER be changed for any reason by any one. The premise of their argument having been crushed as a falsehood, the rest of this point crashes down.
 
That site is hysterical; however, I’ve learned not to spend too much time on people who actually believe those little homemade sites, much less the ones who create them. They do no WANT to hear the truth. They simply want to criticize. They do not WANT an intelligent back and forth dialogue. They are not TRYING to understand anything that they do not understand. They are just criticizing. That is all. They don’t hear anything you say, they don’t read/comprehend anything you send them.

Ask me how I know…:rolleyes:
 
:clapping: for Actaeon

Very well written! I am sure that took you some time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top