P
Philomena
Guest
Is there any proof that Peter celebrated Mass in a way we would easily recognize when he was in Rome?
Yes, there is much proof in the early writings of what we would recognize as the basic form of the Mass. St. Justin pops into my mind. The early Christians followed the pattern of the Jewish service for the Liturgy of the word shown in the book of Acts. They then celebrated the Breaking of the Bread in the homes of Christians in secret. These two parts came together not long after the first century as St. Justin outlines.Is there any proof that Peter celebrated Mass in a way we would easily recognize when he was in Rome?
Good day, PhilomenaIs there any proof that Peter celebrated Mass in a way we would easily recognize when he was in Rome?
Are there any writings describing Peter celebrating? Or someone Peter taught?Yes, there is much proof in the early writings of what we would recognize as the basic form of the Mass. St. Justin pops into my mind. The early Christians followed the pattern of the Jewish service for the Liturgy of the word shown in the book of Acts. They then celebrated the Breaking of the Bread in the homes of Christians in secret. These two parts came together not long after the first century as St. Justin outlines.
Why specifically Peter?Are there any writings describing Peter celebrating? Or someone Peter taught?
Because someone is telling me that the liturgy had not developed by the time Peter was in Rome, hence he would not have used the chalice used by Christ at the Last Supper. This all started when we learned of a cup claiming to be the same cup that Christ used to institute the Eucharist that is kept in Spain. The Valencia(sp?) cup. Supposedly the cup was given to Peter, being the head of the Church.Why specifically Peter?
We have no reason to believe that Peter celebrated the Eucharist any different from that described by St. Paul in 1 Corinthians 11. In fact, Paul says that he “recieved” this teaching from others, presumably the Apostles, including Peter:Because someone is telling me that the liturgy had not developed by the time Peter was in Rome, hence he would not have used the chalice used by Christ at the Last Supper.
23
For I received from the Lord what I also handed on to you, that the Lord Jesus, on the night he was handed over, took bread,
24
and, after he had given thanks, broke it and said, “This is my body that is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”
25
In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”
26
For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord until he comes.
27
Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily will have to answer for the body and blood of the Lord.
28
A person should examine himself, and so eat the bread and drink the cup.
29
For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment on himself.
Doesn’t the last supper count? Since peter was present?Is there any proof that Peter celebrated Mass in a way we would easily recognize when he was in Rome?