P
pcordero
Guest
I’ve asked my priest about this and he would describe it as the effect of God on the world. I’m not completely satisfied with this answer and can’t completely figure out how it would be fully defined as.
I think to define the Holy Spirit in one simple sentence is tricky, but perhaps one could say that the Holy Spirit is the (invisible) Hand of God directing us down the road to salvation, healing and truth.I’ve asked my priest about this and he would describe it as the effect of God on the world. I’m not completely satisfied with this answer and can’t completely figure out how it would be fully defined as.
I have to disagree with your priest and decry that none of the answers so far seem sufficient. In fact, the only sufficient answer is that of the catechism, particularly because the catechism makes the CRITICAL distinction that the Holy Spirit is, in fact, a seperate person of the trinity. The Holy Spirit is not the “effect of God” in the world, He is not “the Love between the Father and the Son”, He is not the “Memory of the Church”.I’ve asked my priest about this and he would describe it as the effect of God on the world. I’m not completely satisfied with this answer and can’t completely figure out how it would be fully defined as.
The Holy Spirit, as His name indicates, is Holy in virtue of His origin, His spiration; He comes therefore from a holy principle; now holiness resides in the will, as wisdom is in the intellect. That is also the reason why He is so often called par excellence, in the writings of the Fathers, Love and Charity. The Father and the Son love one another from all eternity, with a perfect ineffable love; the term of this infinite fruitful mutual love is Their Spirit Who is co-eternal and con-substantial with Them. Only, the Holy Ghost is not indebted to the manner of His Procession precisely for this perfect resemblance to His principle, in other words for His consubstantiality; for to will or love an object does not formally imply the production of its immanent image in the soul that loves, but rather a tendency, a movement of the will towards the thing loved, to be united to it and enjoy it. So, making every allowance for the feebleness of our intellects in knowing, and the unsuitability of our words for expressing the mysteries of the Divine life, if we can grasp how the word generation, freed from all the imperfections of the material order may be applied by analogy to the Procession of the Word, so we may see that the term can in no way befittingly applied to the Procession of the Holy Ghost.I have to disagree with your priest and decry that none of the answers so far seem sufficient. In fact, the only sufficient answer is that of the catechism, particularly because the catechism makes the CRITICAL distinction that the Holy Spirit is, in fact, a seperate person of the trinity. The Holy Spirit is not the “effect of God” in the world, He is not “the Love between the Father and the Son”, He is not the “Memory of the Church”.
He is the paraclete: the one who provides the memory and authority of the church. He EXPRESSES the Love of Christ and the Father. He CAUSES the effects of God acting in the world.
He is a person, not merely a characteristic of another person.
I would like to offer an extension to your priest and a personal understanding:I’ve asked my priest about this and he would describe it as the effect of God on the world. I’m not completely satisfied with this answer and can’t completely figure out how it would be fully defined as.
Perfectly said, hazcompat.The Holy Spirit Is God.
peace
No, thank you. The Holy Spirit as a term has nothing to do with the etymology of the word “spirit” relating to breathing. It has everything to do with the Holy Ghost, namely that we are discussing spirit in terms of distinct personhood. Don’t conflate the use of the modern term Spirit with an ancient meaning that such a word has not possessed in more than a thousand years.It’s an interesting exercise to read the Bible and replace the word “Spirit” with “Breath of God.” Try it.
Sorry to have offended you.No, thank you. The Holy Spirit as a term has nothing to do with the etymology of the word “spirit” relating to breathing. It has everything to do with the Holy Ghost, namely that we are discussing spirit in terms of distinct personhood. Don’t conflate the use of the modern term Spirit with an ancient meaning that such a word has not possessed in more than a thousand years.
I’m not angry or offended, I’m just pointing out that we cannot consider the Holy Spirit to be aspects or actions of God in either the Father or the Son. He is an entirely seperate person of the Trinity, although they are all of one being.Sorry to have offended you.
I would just like to point out that the equivalent hebrew word is “Ru’ach” and the equivalent greek word is “Pneuma” from which we get pneumonia. Both have to do with moving air, breath, etc.
Again, I didn’t write my post to make you angry. It was a reiteration of my blog post on symbolic vs literal communion and the claIm by some non-Catholics that the word “spirit” is synonymous with “symbolic” in John 6:63.
timhollingworth.blogspot.com/2011/01/spirit-and-life-symbolic-communion-or.html
-Tim-