How would you respond to this abortion information?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AmyS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

AmyS

Guest
religioustolerance.org/abo_hist_c.htm

Circa 100 to 150 CE: The Didache (also known as “The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles” , was a document written for the guidance of Christians. It forbade all abortions.
Prior to 380 CE: Many Christian leaders issued unqualified condemnations of abortion. So did two church synods in the early 4th century:
Circa 380 CE: The Apostolic Constitutions allowed abortion if it was done early enough in pregnancy. But it condemned abortion if the fetus was of human shape and contained a soul.
St. Augustine (354-430 CE) accepted the Aristotelian Greek Pagan concept of “delayed ensoulment”. He wrote that a human soul cannot live in an unformed body. 3 Thus, early in pregnancy, an abortion is not murder because no soul is destroyed (or, more accurately, only a vegetable or animal soul is terminated).
Pope Innocent III (1161-1216
He determined that a monk who had arranged for his lover to have an abortion was not guilty of murder if the fetus was not “animated” at the time.
Early in the 13th century, he stated that the soul enters the body of the fetus at the time of “quickening” - when the woman first feels movement of the fetus. Before that time, abortion was a less serious sin, because it terminated only potential human person, not an actual human person.
Pope Sixtus V (1588) issued a Papal bull “Effraenatam” which threatened those who carried out abortions at any stage of gestation with excommunication and the death penalty.
Pope Gregory XIV (1591) revoked the previous Papal bull and reinstated the “quickening” test, which he determined happened 116 days into pregnancy (16½ weeks).
Pope Pius IX (1869) dropped the distinction between the “fetus animatus” and “fetus inanimatus.” The soul was believed to have entered the pre-embryo at conception.
Leo XIII (1878-1903
He Issued a decree in 1884 that prohibited craniotomies. This is an unusual form of abortion used under crisis situations late in pregnancy. It is occasionally needed to save the life of the pregnant woman.
He issued a second degree in 1886 that prohibited all procedures that directly killed the fetus, even if done to save the woman’s life.
Canon law was revised in 1917 and 1983 to refer simply to “the fetus.” The church penalty for abortions at any stage of pregnancy was, and remains, excommunication.
 
The information was posted to me when I was arguing for my pro-life political point of view… I am just curious all of your thoughts?
 
People hate change and will always be resistant to it.

But then again, absolute morality is perfect and never changes under any circumstances.
 
Not an authority, but I would just say (assuming the posted information is true–and it sounds like it is) this is one of those “development of doctrine” things. None of the papal statements that permitted early abortions carried the weight of infallible teaching and so could be modified or further restricted by later teaching. As the science of embryology advanced, and we came to recognize the human person in the womb at all stages, the condemnation became more well-defined and absolute.

Jeff
 
The issue of “animation” or “ensoulment” was an issue of bad biology rather than changing theology. The medievals knew a little but very little of embryology. It was thought the newly conceived was not alive until mom could feel it move.

Now we know that not only is it alive, it is a new and genetically distinct individual of the human species, from conception. The biological understanding has improved; the moral theology is the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top