F
FrDavid96
Guest
In the US, it is rather common (or at least it was until recent decades) to use descriptive names for wines that expressed the idea that it was the equivalent of the European original. Just for example, until a few years ago, many American wine companies made sparkling wines which they called “champagnes.” No, they were not from the Champagne region. Same thing with port and sherry.Okay but why would anyone call altar wines sherry or port when they are not? I’ve never heard of these two being used as a description for wine that is not sherry or port. That does not make any sense to me.
Some altar wines just have those names. Someone might make an “Archangel Sherry” or a “St Nicholas Port.”
They just do it.
The point is that just because we read the words “port” or “sherry” in a name that does not exclude the possibility that it’s a legitimate altar wine. The criteria is whether or not it meets the Church’s standards. The name is irrelevant. If it’s been approved by the bishop (usually the bishop of the place where it’s made), then we can be confident to use it at Mass.