Z
Zenas
Guest
Yes. Otherwise this would not be such a puzzling passage.Isn’t Vinegar classified as “fruit of the vine”?
Yes. Otherwise this would not be such a puzzling passage.Isn’t Vinegar classified as “fruit of the vine”?
So you think Jesus could’ve given the Apostles vinegar to drink at the Last Supper? And that what he drinks in celebration and triumph with His apostles will be VINEGAR? C’mon, it clearly means wine!Isn’t Vinegar classified as “fruit of the vine”?
The sour wine taken on the cross was not in a “cup”, and if you believe the Last Supper was a passover sedar, the wine served at passover is a special wine, different than any other time during the year.These words of Jesus, uttered at the Last Supper, are found in all three of the synoptic gospels. Yet in John 19:28-30, we read:
“28 After this, Jesus, knowing that all things had already been accomplished, to fulfill the Scripture, said, “I am thirsty.”
29 A jar full of sour wine was standing there; so they put a sponge full of the sour wine upon a branch of hyssop and brought it up to His mouth.
30Therefore when Jesus had received the sour wine, He said, “It is finished!” And He bowed His head and gave up His spirit.”
It would seem that at the time Jesus took the sour wine, He had not yet entered into the kingdom. So why did He do it, and how can this be reconciled with His statement at the Last Supper?
No, I didn’t say that.So you think Jesus could’ve given the Apostles vinegar to drink at the Last Supper? And that what he drinks in celebration and triumph with His apostles will be VINEGAR? C’mon, it clearly means wine!
Very interesting thought NotWorthy. Brings to mind the parable about the old and new wine.OK, something else to throw out:
If the vinegar is drunk in accordance with the Passover Feast, and vinegar is good wine gone bad, could this vinegar represent the Old Covenant which has gone sour?
I agree. Christ never drank of consecrated wine between the Last Supper and his death on the Cross.*Mt 26:27-29 And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you; for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. *
I tell you I shall not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new **with you **in my Father’s kingdom.”
The following is my personal way of understanding Our Lord’s statement.
The "this fruit of the vine" was consecrated wine, the consecrated wine of the Eucharist which Jesus had just instituted. Jesus would not drink consecrated wine (His blood) until He drank it “new with them” when they would be celebrating the Mass in His “Father’s kingdom” - the Church.
Nita
if you read the passages carefully, yes “with you” means that they all will be drinking wine together at the banquet of the righteous.It doesn’t say that the apostles will drink, it just seems to imply that they would be with Jesus when he drinks. And at least John was there. Also, the kingdom of God exists where ever God is king, that is, the church.
No, “fruit of the vine” is a idiom for good olde wine.Isn’t Vinegar classified as “fruit of the vine”?
I believe a careful reading of Scott Hahn shows he is equating the fourth cup with the sour wine in John 19:29. His analysis of these events is really flawless except the fourth cup doesn’t match up very well with when Jesus said He would again take of the fruit of the vine.
For the record Christ took the wine/vingar only John was there only John makes note of this as well as a number of other things John makes note that are not in Mark, Mathew.I never thot Jesus took it.
Again, the sponge that was put to his lips was not a “4th” cup of Passover wine, but a fulfillment of prophecy.Let me ask you, what Scriptures did Jesus fulfill by thirsting? Could it have been the Scriptures that tell of the Passover Feast?
Good points! I’ve never heard of the marriage tradition. That’s one of the reasons its so important to be familiar with the culture of the day when these Scriptures were written. Too many people try and apply those words to today’s culture.Again, the sponge that was put to his lips was not a “4th” cup of Passover wine, but a fulfillment of prophecy.
John 19:28-29
Later, knowing that all was now completed, and so that the scripture would be fulfilled, Jesus said, “I thirst.” A jar of wine vinegar was there, so they soaked a sponge in it, put the sponge on a stalk of the hyssop plant, and lifted it to Jesus’ lips.
The scripture fulfilled-
Psalm 69-21
They put gall in my food and gave me vinegar for my thirst.
In Jewish tradition of those days, the man who proposed marriage to the woman would raise up a cup of wine, and if the would-be bride agreed to the proposal of the marriage covenant, she would pick that cup up and drink from it. So if the cup Jesus raised was a marriage proposal to his bride, the passage “I will never drink of this fruit of the vine until…” would make sense if you take the wedding in heaven described in Revelation 19.
One last point on this comment: Although it becomes clear when read in light of Revelation 19, I bet it had the Apostles scratching their heads!!! Of course, Jesus seemed always to have the Apostles scratching their heads in confusion!!!In Jewish tradition of those days, the man who proposed marriage to the woman would raise up a cup of wine, and if the would-be bride agreed to the proposal of the marriage covenant, she would pick that cup up and drink from it. So if the cup Jesus raised was a marriage proposal to his bride, the passage “I will never drink of this fruit of the vine until…” would make sense if you take the wedding in heaven described in Revelation 19.
Are you sure? Weren’t those Psalms (were they the great Hallels?) sung during the Passover? Doesn’t one of the Synoptic Gospels talk of Jesus withdrawing to the Garden of Gethsemane after they finished singing?fourth cup still does not work, Jesus forgot to recite those 3 or 4 Psalms at length.
“After singing a hymn, they went out to the Mount of Olives.” Matthew 26:30; also Mark 14:26. So the fourth cup fits in this regard. I’m just not sure about “drink[ing] it new in the kingdom of God.” However, the posters on this thread have provided more food for thought than I ever imagined would come forth on this topic.fourth cup still does not work, Jesus forgot to recite those 3 or 4 Psalms at length.
I’m sorry, but Luke does not say that Jesus ate or drank. of either the bread (verse 19) or the wine (verse 20).none of the gospel accounts gives much detail about the number of cups or which ones they drank. luke has only two cups (matthew and mark each have one if i remember correctly), and interestingly, Jesus says he won’t drink again in 22:18, but he takes another cup in verse 20. i think we’re reading into this way too much.
It would seem that Jesus did NOT drink of the Fruit of the Vine just as He prophecied in verse 18.19 Then he took the bread, said the blessing, broke it, and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which will be given for you; do this in memory of me.” 20 And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which will be shed for you.