It sounds to me as if you are actually hovering around the idea of thinking that humanity almost ‘needed’ to sin in order to ‘achieve.’
That you thought that it was somehow more ‘loving’ of God to save us, so it was ‘better’ for us that we sinned.
That we had to develop machines and technology because we were ‘exiled’ from paradise. In paradise, Adam and Eve did not have to ‘work’; here, man ‘eats by the sweat of his brow’ and so those who ‘work smart’ do better.
But again, turn it around. What you are speaking of is ‘human achievement’, as if yay for us, just look at how wonderful and creative we are, and if Adam and Eve hadn’t sinned, wouldn’t humanity be just sitting around the garden doing **nothing, **learning nothing, capable of nothing but just ‘blind obedience’ to God’s will.
But if humanity had never sinned, we would have so much ‘more’ than ‘human achievement’ (so often achieved at the expense of the dignity and even the lives of other human beings). We can’t even begin to imagine how much more. Think, for example, of Jesus. Jesus is not only true God, but true man. Think of what it could have been like for all beings to have the ‘humanity’ of Christ–to be constantly and freely choosing to do nothing but God’s will instead of doing evil. . .and imagine a society of such beings. . .and ‘human achievement’ in our history rather pales in comparison IMO.