B
brotherhrolf
Guest
I see where I made my mistake. No, I can no more speak Latin as a language than I can speak Spanish. I can, however, read Spanish fluently and I think that distinction needs to be made. What do I mean?
You don’t need to SPEAK Latin as a language to be able to understand Latin anymore than I needed to be able to speak Spanish as to be able to read and understand the printed word before me. I can read Spanish fairly fluently and I did pass my GSFLT in Spanish for my master’s. My verbal Spanish is going to be very, very halting yet I would be able to pick up and read any Spanish newspaper.
So, learning the Latin of the Mass is not even in the same ballpark as learning Latin as a language. I didn’t have any problem as a kid - most of us didn’t. And then you have to consider just how many Latin words were incorporated into English during the Renaissance. If you can read Shakespeare you won’t have any problem with Latin.
You don’t need to SPEAK Latin as a language to be able to understand Latin anymore than I needed to be able to speak Spanish as to be able to read and understand the printed word before me. I can read Spanish fairly fluently and I did pass my GSFLT in Spanish for my master’s. My verbal Spanish is going to be very, very halting yet I would be able to pick up and read any Spanish newspaper.
So, learning the Latin of the Mass is not even in the same ballpark as learning Latin as a language. I didn’t have any problem as a kid - most of us didn’t. And then you have to consider just how many Latin words were incorporated into English during the Renaissance. If you can read Shakespeare you won’t have any problem with Latin.