H
HagiaSophia
Guest
Adopting logos such as a capital A within a circle and a black and red star, the new anarchists are part of an active political cult established by disillusioned communists and socialists, who refuse to abandon their goal of world domination.
It is ironic that they have young people rioting against globalization, which is exactly what they have in mind, but with them in charge. One of their gambits is open borders, and recently another anarchy Web site cautioned workers not to be misguided by reports that immigrants are the root of economic problems. Activists who include open borders in their game plan for creating confusion and disorder in the United States, I term immigration anarchists.
The news media identify as anarchists the new wave of rioters and violence-prone demonstrators at international events, including meetings of the Group of Seven, the World Trade Organization, and the World Economic Forum. What do these ski-masked anarchists, who are rioting in the streets, breaking windows, throwing bombs, pillaging, and plundering, really want? In admitting to reporters that they are “anti-globalization” protesters, these neo-anarchists say they are against the misuse of power by all authority.
Some of these young people, who are committing criminal acts, believe that utopia will follow destruction of all civilized society; but when questioned, they can offer no concept of how anti-authoritarianism is to be achieved and then maintained.
Their backers, however, have a well-thought-out plan for takeover by an oligarchy. Some are unreformed believers in world communism, with a vision of themselves as totalitarian rulers. Some anti-globalization protesters turn out to be Islamic radicals, using the broad back of anarchy to achieve their goal of an Islam-dominated world.
Although student activists may be naïve, their professors know very well that civilization cannot exist without some form of governance. Pure chaos would spiral into human annihilation. Nihilism, however, is on the rise. In the United States, a pervasive lack of personal responsibility smacks of anarchy, as does an apathy toward national heritage that devalues U.S. citizenship and, in turn, respect for U.S. laws, beginning with immigration laws.
The survival of the United States as a nation depends on political and moral imperatives. Culture, ethos, heritage, and an official language are the foundation of any nation.
Immigrant special-interest groups (who refuse to distinguish between legal and illegal entry) whine, however, that America is a nation of immigrants. They argue that the United States must accept every foreign national regardless of immigration status and that illegal immigrants are due all the rights of citizenship, even voting rights. They contend that immigrants need not assimilate but may keep their own cultures.
Some misguided jurists have gone so far as to opine that “illegal aliens” have the same constitutional rights as U.S. citizens. Such judges have thrown in their lot with the immigration anarchists, forgetting the words of Thurgood Marshall (who would become U.S. Supreme Court Justice): “Lawlessness is lawlessness. Anarchy is anarchy is anarchy. Neither race nor color nor frustration is an excuse for either lawlessness or anarchy.”
The immigrant special-interest groups, in realty, want a nation divided. They want laws to apply only when immigrants choose to obey them.
National Council of La Raza (or The Race), a Mexican-American political organization in the United States, and its “gringo” supporters work for the elimination of all borders (land and sea) around the United States of America. Their supporters include giant philanthropies, such as the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and Carnegie Foundation.
Islamic terrorists are among the no-borders advocates who seek to bring the United States down to the economic and social level of Third-World nations. They seek a poorly educated populace ruled by a weak government controlled by a totalitarian oligarchy. Differing somewhat with their immigrant-rights allies, Islamic terrorists envision a Muslim oligarchy ruling the world…
newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/12/21/112650.shtml
It is ironic that they have young people rioting against globalization, which is exactly what they have in mind, but with them in charge. One of their gambits is open borders, and recently another anarchy Web site cautioned workers not to be misguided by reports that immigrants are the root of economic problems. Activists who include open borders in their game plan for creating confusion and disorder in the United States, I term immigration anarchists.
The news media identify as anarchists the new wave of rioters and violence-prone demonstrators at international events, including meetings of the Group of Seven, the World Trade Organization, and the World Economic Forum. What do these ski-masked anarchists, who are rioting in the streets, breaking windows, throwing bombs, pillaging, and plundering, really want? In admitting to reporters that they are “anti-globalization” protesters, these neo-anarchists say they are against the misuse of power by all authority.
Some of these young people, who are committing criminal acts, believe that utopia will follow destruction of all civilized society; but when questioned, they can offer no concept of how anti-authoritarianism is to be achieved and then maintained.
Their backers, however, have a well-thought-out plan for takeover by an oligarchy. Some are unreformed believers in world communism, with a vision of themselves as totalitarian rulers. Some anti-globalization protesters turn out to be Islamic radicals, using the broad back of anarchy to achieve their goal of an Islam-dominated world.
Although student activists may be naïve, their professors know very well that civilization cannot exist without some form of governance. Pure chaos would spiral into human annihilation. Nihilism, however, is on the rise. In the United States, a pervasive lack of personal responsibility smacks of anarchy, as does an apathy toward national heritage that devalues U.S. citizenship and, in turn, respect for U.S. laws, beginning with immigration laws.
The survival of the United States as a nation depends on political and moral imperatives. Culture, ethos, heritage, and an official language are the foundation of any nation.
Immigrant special-interest groups (who refuse to distinguish between legal and illegal entry) whine, however, that America is a nation of immigrants. They argue that the United States must accept every foreign national regardless of immigration status and that illegal immigrants are due all the rights of citizenship, even voting rights. They contend that immigrants need not assimilate but may keep their own cultures.
Some misguided jurists have gone so far as to opine that “illegal aliens” have the same constitutional rights as U.S. citizens. Such judges have thrown in their lot with the immigration anarchists, forgetting the words of Thurgood Marshall (who would become U.S. Supreme Court Justice): “Lawlessness is lawlessness. Anarchy is anarchy is anarchy. Neither race nor color nor frustration is an excuse for either lawlessness or anarchy.”
The immigrant special-interest groups, in realty, want a nation divided. They want laws to apply only when immigrants choose to obey them.
National Council of La Raza (or The Race), a Mexican-American political organization in the United States, and its “gringo” supporters work for the elimination of all borders (land and sea) around the United States of America. Their supporters include giant philanthropies, such as the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and Carnegie Foundation.
Islamic terrorists are among the no-borders advocates who seek to bring the United States down to the economic and social level of Third-World nations. They seek a poorly educated populace ruled by a weak government controlled by a totalitarian oligarchy. Differing somewhat with their immigrant-rights allies, Islamic terrorists envision a Muslim oligarchy ruling the world…
newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/12/21/112650.shtml
