In 'Design' vs. Darwinism, Darwin Wins Point in Rome

[buffalo]

wildleafblower:

I’ve found more about Prof. Michael Behe! Everyone, please READ the Department of Biological Sciences of Lehigh University’s statement.

lehigh.edu/~inbios/news/evolution.htm

This is not good, not good, not good news for proponents of ID.

(I’m sorry, but…but…but I find myself in a laughing mode. Please forgive me, but I can’t help it. I’d like to return when i stop laughing which might be never! )

This is not disturbing at all. At this point there is no emperical evidence for design. But can we rule out forever that there will not be?

Give it time - it either will develop methods or it won’t. If it never reaches scientific acceptance it still has a place in metaphysics.

Perhaps we should teach science and an additional class in metaphysics.

And…ONLY teach emperical science in science classs.

 

[wildleafblower]

buffalo said, “This is not disturbing at all. At this point there is no emperical evidence for design. But can we rule out forever that there will not be?’”

I’m not disturbed by the news. I’m elated! Furthermore, we don’t have to rule out the evidence that I can design floral arrangements.

buffalo said, “Give it time - it either will develop methods or it won’t. If it never reaches scientific acceptance it still has a place in metaphysics.”

I already have the know how about floral design. It’s not metaphysics!

buffalo said, “Perhaps we should teach science and an additional class in metaphysics. And…ONLY teach emperical science in science classs.”

You don’t have to take a class in science to learn floral design. METAPHYSICS is pure bogas bunkism to the ultimate max! Wipe it out of your memory bank ASAP. NOW! Do it! Get smart!

 

[buffalo]

wildleafblower:

buffalo said, “This is not disturbing at all. At this point there is no emperical evidence for design. But can we rule out forever that there will not be?’”

I’m not disturbed by the news. I’m elated! Furthermore, we don’t have to rule out the evidence that I can design floral arrangements.

buffalo said, “Give it time - it either will develop methods or it won’t. If it never reaches scientific acceptance it still has a place in metaphysics.”

I already have the know how about floral design. It’s not metaphysics!

buffalo said, “Perhaps we should teach science and an additional class in metaphysics. And…ONLY teach emperical science in science classs.”

You don’t have to take a class in science to learn floral design. METAPHYSICS is pure bogas bunkism to the ultimate max! Wipe it out of your memory bank ASAP. NOW! Do it! Get smart!

That is not the point. Whether you have the ability to design is not the question. The question is if we come across one of your designs can we determine if you have an IQ.