L
Lucretius
Guest
In other words, you have to do something, you have to function, to be. This worldview seems to be based on how human artifacts are. If a refrigerator doesn’t work, it is no longer a refrigerator, but a pile of metal. This philosophy works for artifacts and devices, but then is stops making sense of things when they are substantial, especially if the things are alive. Of course, the philosophy of the Moderns do not realize this, and treat organic things as if they were artifacts.It’s both. As John Paul II says in his book Memory and Identity:
“We have to go back to the period before the Enlightenment, especially to the revolution brought about by the philosophical thought of Descartes. The cogito, ergo sum (I think, therefore I am) radically changed the way of doing philosophy. In the pre-Cartesian period, philosophy, that is to say the cogito, or rather the cognosco, was subordinate to esse, which was considered prior. To Descartes, however, the esse seemed secondary, and he judged the cogito to be prior. This not only changed the direction of philosophizing, but it marked the decisive abandonment of what philosophy had been hitherto, particularly the philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquinas, and namely the philosophy of esse.”
I think (as well as many others) that this metaphysics (that everything is a sort of machine) was influenced by all the new machines that were being created in Descartes’s and Galileo’s time (the scientific revolution). It also influenced religion. Deism, for example: God started the machine, and left it running ever since (the universe is God’s artifact). William Paley’s watch maker argument is another. The intelligent design theorists of today view the world like this as well.
I think its influence can be seen in the abortionist justifications of their holocaust: since a fetus doesn’t function as a person, therefore it must not be a person (non agit ergo non est).
That’s why I’m still trying to climb out of the massive ditch that is the modern worldview, the modern metaphysics. There is an author who once wrote that the Medieval ages were the real Age of Reason, while the “Enlightenment” was the Age of Unreason, the Age of Iconoclasm. Every day I believe him more and more (of course, most “educated people” think most thinkers in the Medieval west were a bunch of fundamentalists who hated women, so I don’t trust their opinion in the slightest).
BTW, I was trying to point out that “cogito ergo sum” was just a species of the overall reversal of the medieval axiom “agere sequitur esse”. IOW,
“cogito ergo sum” (or “res cogitans esse sequitur cogitare”) is a specific application of (the false) “esse sequitur agere,” and
“res cogitans sum ergo cogito” (or “cogitare sequitur res cogitans esse”) is a specific application of (the correct) “agere sequitur esse.”
Christi pax,
Lucretius
, I was self reflective enough to know that I needed help because I was so sad 