Is Catholic art that's historically inaccurate lying?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Guest1

New member
Talking to someone online. The way Jesus is depicted being crucified in a picture might be historically inaccurate. If it is would you say that’s a lie? or it’s lying?

For example with the last supper I think historically Jesus would have been reclining along with the apostles too instead of sitting to eat like we see.

I’d appreciate help.
Thank you.
 
I don’t think there’s really anything wrong with artistic license in and of itself. That’s why I don’t get hung up on things like about the colour of Jesus’s skin or anything like that, because I honestly don’t care.
 
I don’t think the artist is saying he was there, or represents his work as historically accurate.

It’s an experience he wishes to share.
 
Art isn’t meant to be historically accurate. It is meant to be inspiring. The people of each culture and time portrayed things as best they could and usually in ways that were familiar. It is not the same as lying. Not even close.
 
Talking to someone online. The way Jesus is depicted being crucified in a picture might be historically inaccurate. If it is would you say that’s a lie? or it’s lying?
If it were lying only a photograph which did not exist would not be lying.
 
I like the religious art of Salvador Dali, which is certainly not historically accurate, but often it is theologically accurate.
 
might be historically inaccurate. If it is would you say that’s a lie? or it’s lying?
Might be historically inaccurate but if it is historically inaccurate, is it a lie?

My mind is still trying to gauge the number of contingencies in that premise…
 
Art throughout history has always had this kind of thing about not being 100% accurate to the real source material from cultural representation (such as “orientalism” which seems more of an exaggeration) to how historical religious figures are depicted in art.

Like @DisorientingSneeze mentioned, it can help with inspiration. I’ll use a famous work from Caravaggio, “The Call of St. Mathew”, 1600.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
This isn’t exactly 100% accurate since these men are wearing clothing from Caravaggio’s time (and they’re all European too) and not from when Christ was on Earth, doesn’t mean this is lying. This is very inspiring, especially from how lighting is used. I don’t know if this helps, but I wouldn’t worry over it. 🙂
 
Last edited:
The intent with the art is to convey certain religious truths, not to deceive (that would be lying). There are many ways to convey truth to an audience, including using recognizable language and images.
 
If you are going to make a bar like that (which is silly, because we don’t have time travel or Roman videos), I suppose that would make stick figure art, or any non-photo-realistic art, or any three year old’s art, also a lie.

If you are working in the genre of “historical art,” that is different from the genre of “religious art.”

Religious art portrays either a window to Heaven, as with Eastern icons, or a subjective feeling or vision or illustration of a religious event, such as a hagiographical or Biblical scene.

It is basically a physical version of a visualization, such as one might create when meditating on the Bible or the mysteries of the Rosary. The details will be symbolic or psychologically meaningful to the artist. The people might look like people the artist knows. The outfits will tend to be either fashions contemporary to the artist, or of a generic religious style (usually 3rd or 4th century AD in Western art, because that is when Christian art went big).

There is nothing wrong with using historical details as part of an artist’s piety. But that is not the point. The point is to depict a prayerful feeling about a situation, and to elicit prayer from the viewer - or even life changes.
 
Last edited:
Talking to someone online. The way Jesus is depicted being crucified in a picture might be historically inaccurate. If it is would you say that’s a lie? or it’s lying?

For example with the last supper I think historically Jesus would have been reclining along with the apostles too instead of sitting to eat like we see.
Its “art” not “scripture”…art may be an interpretation, but it is no more the inspired Word of God than biblical commentary or footnotes are.

Lying implies purposeful deceit to advance an agenda…Satan is the deceiver and liar, not Di Vinci!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top