K
KidCatholic1
Guest
It says it in the title. I am wondering this, but I use the phrase rather sparingly. I try to avoid using God’s name in anger any way.
It is a sin, because you are making your own judgment (that something is worthless or unholy) and saying that it is God’s judgment. This is not unlike saying that something is “Gd-d***d.” You should not use the name of God to make your judgments sound more forceful.
This is what I thought of. You are attempting to bolster your authority by stating that God’s opinion is in accordance with yours. What is not revealed by revelation we cannot absolutely discern about God’s Stance. Catholicism is based on absolute truths so if it falls short, it cannot be accepted.It is a sin, because you are making your own judgment (that something is worthless or unholy) and saying that it is God’s judgment. This is not unlike saying that something is “God-damned.” You should not use the name of God to make your judgments sound more forceful.
I see your point. We say things that we do not literally mean, out of habit. Still we are commanded “You shall not invoke the name of the Lord, your God, in vain. For the Lord will not leave unpunished anyone who invokes his name in vain.” (Exodus 20:7, also Deuteronomy 5:11)I will not answer for whether it is sinful or not, but Beryllos’ claim seems to be quite far-fetched to me.
I doubt that the common usage of God-forsaken has any intent to borrow God’s authority to condemn. Again, it may be that it is sinful, I know not. But the intent described simply does not exist, at least in common usage.
No more does it exist here, than it exists in the one who says “you’re the best,” to actually affirm that the person spoken of is, indeed, the best. It is merely words, and it is not common human convention to interpret these words as conveying literal truth.
This is evident. Has anyone here ever wondered to themselves, “does he or she truly think *I *am the best person?” Of course not. Will someone go on, now, and call the person a sinner for “lying”? I’m sure some sort of radical might, but it does not make it a sin to tell someone that they’re “the best.”
Exodus 20:7
Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
So, for example, exclaiming “Oh my God!” when you see a funny video of a dancing cat would probably be inappropriate; in my opinion, it would be sinful. The same expression when one learns of or witnesses a serious accident may be acceptable as a prayer for the victims (and those who are affected, including oneself).The Third Word, “Thou shalt not take the name of Jehovah thy God in vain,” is closely connected with the former two. Although there is no God beside Jehovah, the absolute One, and His divine essence cannot be seen or conceived of under any form, He had made known the glory of His nature in His name (Exodus 3:14., Exodus 6:2), and this was not to be abused by His people. שׁם נשׁא does not mean to utter the name (נשׁא never has this meaning), but in all the passages in which it has been so rendered it retains its proper meaning, “to take up, [lift] up, raise;” e.g., to take up or raise (begin) a proverb (Numbers 23:7; Job 27:1), to lift up a song (Psalm 81:3), or a prayer (Isaiah 37:4). And it is evident from the parallel in Psalm 24:4, “to lift up his soul to vanity,” that it does not mean “to utter” here. שׁוא does not signify a lie (שׁקר), but according to its etymon שׁאה, to be waste, it denotes that which is waste and disorder, hence that which is empty, vain, and nugatory, for which there is no occasion. The word prohibits all employment of the name of God for vain and unworthy objects, and includes not only false swearing, which is condemned in Leviticus 19:12 as a profanation of the name of Jehovah, but trivial swearing in the ordinary intercourse of life, and every use of the name of God in the service of untruth and lying, for imprecation, witchcraft, or conjuring; whereas the true employment of the name of God is confined to “invocation, prayer, praise, and thanksgiving,” which proceeds from a pure, believing heart. The natural heart is very liable to transgress this command, and therefore it is solemnly enforced by the threat, “for Jehovah will not hold him guiltless” (leave him unpunished), etc.
I agree with this. I am guilty of having said “God-d*mned” many times, but I have since stopped. This has only been when I am extremely mad about something. Although that’s no excuse. I have also said “God-awful” and “God-forsaken” just recently, and didn’t really know if it was a bad thing. But it is still using His Name, in a vengeful way, and we are only supposed to use His Name reverently. It only makes sense.It is a sin, because you are making your own judgment (that something is worthless or unholy) and saying that it is God’s judgment. This is not unlike saying that something is “God-damned.” You should not use the name of God to make your judgments sound more forceful.