N
Nihilist
Guest
God calls Himself by the name - “I AM”. Does this hold a clue the self is really the same as God?
I am just thinking of this as a theory- but consider:
-‘this universe’ (the one I live in) could not exist without me. If ‘I’ ceased to exist, as far as ‘I’ am concerned, ‘this universe’ (i.e. my universe) would also cease to exist. Sure, other people’s universe would still exist for them, but we each necessarily live only in our own worlds (I don’t mean this solipsistically, but in the sense that all our realities are individually unique);
I know this is an unorthodox theory, but I would be interested if anyone else has considered it.
I am just thinking of this as a theory- but consider:
-‘this universe’ (the one I live in) could not exist without me. If ‘I’ ceased to exist, as far as ‘I’ am concerned, ‘this universe’ (i.e. my universe) would also cease to exist. Sure, other people’s universe would still exist for them, but we each necessarily live only in our own worlds (I don’t mean this solipsistically, but in the sense that all our realities are individually unique);
- the existence of everything else, but I, seem contingent. They can be imagined as NOT existing. But I cannot imagine myself as not existing (I can imagine my death, but the very act of imagining this pre-supposes a res imaginans, which is not other than “I”). The “I AM” is the first condition of synthetic unity. Without an “I” (a basis of the sythentic unity of perception) there would ‘be’ no time, space, anything…(cf. Kant)
- The “I” in a radical sense (the res cogitans) is, insofar as it purely is the ‘I’ (the res cogitans, separated from the flesh and the world) is by its nature impassible, and indivisible, and hence immortal (cf. Descartes).
I know this is an unorthodox theory, but I would be interested if anyone else has considered it.