C
cho_pilo
Guest
Restaurants are offering bottomless iced teas but prohibiting its customers from sharing. Reason is business.
Why would the reason matter? If the menu or resturant says one per person…then yes sharing is stealing, it wouldn’t matter why the resturant has that policy if you knew it up front and still shared…you intentionally defrauded the resturant.Restaurants are offering bottomless iced teas but prohibiting its customers from sharing. Reason is business.
If you’re going to take the opinion that sharing a drink with another adult is stealing, then sharing with a child is also stealing. It doesn’t matter if they’re only going to drink a little bit. Your reasoning for this exception is like someone justifying stealing a dollar because it was only a small amount and so does not really constitute theft.The only exception I would make to this, is if you are sharing with your toddler and that is because generally they are not going to drink very much of it.
I think that is a good way of putting it, especially if this drink included free refills. If not, would there be a difference between this restaurant’s policy and say, a hypothetical new policy by Pepsi that says only one person per can of Pepsi?Would you go to an “all you can eat” buffet, purchase one plate, and then proceed to allow your whole family to eat off one plate? If not, then neither can you share the drink.