Is it degrading/condescending to refer to a woman as 'female'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AugustTherese
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, someone once got upset with me when I called her “ma’am” and she was a 50 something year old lady. But just because someone will always get offended at something does not mean they are right. Why would referring to a girl or woman as a female be degrading? It’s what they are.
 
I literally just got crucified for referring to a girl whom I was engaged to as ‘this female’ to protect her identity. I had absolutely no clue that people got offended by the use of ‘female’ in the context of referring to a girl/woman, i.e. human being that is not male.
 
Last edited:
It’s virtually impossible to keep ahead of the language police these days, or to avoid getting in trouble with the brown shirted forces of political correctness.
 
So it’s possible that whoever is offended is offended because the word sounds like it’s referring to something nonhuman
But for anyone to speculate as that being my intention, especially referring to someone whom I love and was engaged to, as something nonhuman, seems disingenuous to me.
 
“Non-male” is generally safe. Don’t use the term “broad” either.
 
Last edited:
We generally don’t call men as “males” outside of hospital records or police reports, so why refer to women thusly?
Okay, but is not that kind of a non-sequitur? Is that an attempt at equality (sameness) simply by the mere fact of what we do not call men?
 
Okay, but is not that kind of a non-sequitur? Is that an attempt at equality (sameness) simply by the mere fact of what we do not call men?
Um, yes. Why would it be okay to casually call a woman a female, when we almost never call men males?
 
Um, yes. Why would it be okay to casually call a woman a female, when we almost never call men males?
That logic doesn’t flow there; e.g. Why would it be okay to casually call a child a kid, when we almost never call adults kids? Hence, non-sequitur.

“Male and female he created them.” Genesis 3:5
 
Last edited:
I use “males” all the time in casual contexts, or at least, as often as I use “female”…
 
I use “males” all the time in casual contexts, or at least, as often as I use “female”…
Fair enough. I never hear “male” used in casual conversation like “female” though, and usually when someone calls me a “female” it’s in a denigrating way.
 
Last edited:
and usually when someone calls me a “female” it’s in a denigrating way.
And, that is inherently wrong if that is the intention. But, from the context I used ‘this female’ in, there is no way any rational ‘female’ or ‘male’ would presume this use to be ‘denigrating’.
 
I had absolutely no idea…
Nope, is it so to call them women? If so then it would be degrading to call men men or males.

Because men and males are a part of women and females.

fe + male = female
wo + man = woman
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top