J
JDGaney
Guest
Like, if a Franciscan wanted to suddenly become a Jesuit or Dominican? Can he do that? I know he’s always a priest, but can he switch orders?
Hello,Like, if a Franciscan wanted to suddenly become a Jesuit or Dominican? Can he do that? I know he’s always a priest, but can he switch orders?
Here in the Archdiocese of Denver, we have one diocesan priest of 37 years, who became a Trappist monk. I don’t know if there have been other priests, but Father Hoffman did it. Here’s a link to the article:I have no idea for the Priests who have made religious vows.
They take permanent vows. It’s not so simple as superiors agreeing.Hello,
He can do it if the respective superiors are favorable. It would not be a “sudden” process…maybe you didn’t mean that literally.
See canon 684 in the Code of Canon Law for general rules. Individual institutes might have more precise regulations.
Dan
Hello,They take permanent vows. It’s not so simple as superiors agreeing.
*Can *they? Certainly. It’s a bit of a process, however.Like, if a Franciscan wanted to suddenly become a Jesuit or Dominican? Can he do that? I know he’s always a priest, but can he switch orders?
Relevant Canon Law:The regular may also, in theory, migrate from one order to another more severe; from this point of view, the Carthusian Order is the most perfect. In practice, failing the consent of the superior-general of both the orders in question, these migrations take place only with the authorization of the Holy See. The professed regular who migrates into another order makes his novitiate afresh therein, but retains his first profession until he has made solemn profession in his new order. Until that time, if he does not persevere in the second order, he must take his former place in the order he has quitted; and even then if, in addition to the essential vows of religion, his first profession has laid any special obligations upon him, for instance that of not accepting any ecclesiastical dignities, these obligations are not removed by his new profession.
CHAPTER VI.
SEPARATION OF MEMBERS FROM THE INSTITUTE
Art. 1.
TRANSFER TO ANOTHER INSTITUTE
Can. 684 §1. A member in perpetual vows cannot transfer from one religious institute to another except by a grant of the supreme moderator of each institute and with the consent of their respective councils.
§2. After completing a probation which is to last at least three years, the member can be admitted to perpetual profession in the new institute. If the member refuses to make this profession or is not admitted to make it by competent superiors, however, the member is to return to the original institute unless an indult of secularization has been obtained.
§3. For a religious to transfer from an autonomous monastery to another of the same institute or federation or confederation, the consent of the major superior of each monastery and of the chapter of the receiving monastery is required and is sufficient, without prejudice to other requirements established by proper law; a new profession is not required.
§4. Proper law is to determine the time and manner of the probation which must precede the profession of a member in the new institute.
§5. For a transfer to be made to a secular institute or a society of apostolic life or from them to a religious institute, permission of the Holy See is required, whose mandates must be observed.
Can. 685 §1. Until a person makes profession in the new institute, the rights and obligations which the member had in the former institute are suspended although the vows remain. Nevertheless, from the beginning of probation, the member is bound to the observance of the proper law of the new institute.
§2. Through profession in the new institute, the member is incorporated into it while the preceding vows, rights, and obligations cease.
Respectfully, they don’t have to be excused from permanent vows first. Read the citations I have provided above for reference.BTW orders are not institutes - it’s tougher for members of Orders. They have to be excused from the Permanent vows first.
Since Franciscans, Jesuits and Dominicans can all teach (for instance) I’m not sure what one has to offer over the others.
While it is common for everyone to talk about “religious orders”, and for some communities to refer to themselves as “religious orders”, the Code does not use the term “religious order.” Instead, it uses “religious institute” and so, as far as the Code is concerned, orders are institutes. The referenced canon(s) apply to “orders.”BTW orders are not institutes …