T
Teles
Guest
I’m struggling and I’m hoping your comments might help. I feel that Jesus came for the sinners (all of us). I think that the Catholic Church’s teachings are right on the target. People should know that for communion we are receiving Jesus Christ and we should be in a state of grace. I strongly believe that the Church should continue to teach this fact to the point of defending the Host from any enemys, but would Jesus deny himself from the “John Kerry’s.”
I read a thread a few weeks ago about possibly putting unconsecrated hosts to be distributed to the people that take the stand of pro-abortion and it got me thinking. If someone gave me an unconsecrated host, by accident, and if I was in a state of grace, what’s to say that God wouldn’t make that piece of bread his body through my faith. I would have been under the impression that the sacrifice was made at the priests hands.
On the other hand a whole lot of so-called Catholics don’t know that the bread and wine turn into the body and blood of Jesus. A lot take it for granted. Does this really mean that they are recieving Jesus? Their faith is the one telling them that Jesus is in or is not in communion.
I’ve heard of cases where Devil worshipers try to steal the Eucharist, and a lot of people might think they can put a hold on Jesus to the extent of “Devil worshipers” using the Eucharist for what ever ritual they can think of, but isn’t the hatred for Jesus the sin, instead of the fact they may be doing the whatever they do with the Eucharist?
My point is that the Church should continue to emphasize that Jesus is what we are receiving at communion and that we should be in a worthy state, but doesn’t it seem wrong that if we as a church teach the truth but the ones that don’t understand should be denied of Christ when they might be the ones that need him the most. It seems to me sometimes that even as Catholics we want to put a hold on Jesus saying, “This is my Jesus and I am going to give it to whom I think is fit.” Please, I don’t mean to sound blasphemous. I’m just trying to learn more.
I read a thread a few weeks ago about possibly putting unconsecrated hosts to be distributed to the people that take the stand of pro-abortion and it got me thinking. If someone gave me an unconsecrated host, by accident, and if I was in a state of grace, what’s to say that God wouldn’t make that piece of bread his body through my faith. I would have been under the impression that the sacrifice was made at the priests hands.
On the other hand a whole lot of so-called Catholics don’t know that the bread and wine turn into the body and blood of Jesus. A lot take it for granted. Does this really mean that they are recieving Jesus? Their faith is the one telling them that Jesus is in or is not in communion.
I’ve heard of cases where Devil worshipers try to steal the Eucharist, and a lot of people might think they can put a hold on Jesus to the extent of “Devil worshipers” using the Eucharist for what ever ritual they can think of, but isn’t the hatred for Jesus the sin, instead of the fact they may be doing the whatever they do with the Eucharist?
My point is that the Church should continue to emphasize that Jesus is what we are receiving at communion and that we should be in a worthy state, but doesn’t it seem wrong that if we as a church teach the truth but the ones that don’t understand should be denied of Christ when they might be the ones that need him the most. It seems to me sometimes that even as Catholics we want to put a hold on Jesus saying, “This is my Jesus and I am going to give it to whom I think is fit.” Please, I don’t mean to sound blasphemous. I’m just trying to learn more.