Is it wrong for gay couples to adopt part II

[alliWantisGod]

Hi everyone,
This is a new thread in response to a small subargument in my previous thread “is it wrong for gay couples to adopt”.

Here is my question: is it more evil for a child to die starving on the street or be adopted by a friendly necrophiliac couple? Which is the better option?

 

[LittleFlower378]

Neither. A child needs a mother and father to be raised healthy.

 

[Faithdancer]

Are the necrophiliac couple both living?

 

[TheTrinitySaves]

Neither.** A child needs a mother and father to be raised healthy**.

I see.

So everyone who grew up raised by a single mother/father was not raised healthy.
I will be sure to pass the news along to Mother Theresa and countless saints who were raised by single mothers. They will be deeply saddened to hear this news.

 

[TheTrinitySaves]

Hi everyone,
This is a new thread in response to a small subargument in my previous thread “is it wrong for gay couples to adopt”.

Here is my question: is it more evil for a child to die starving on the street or be adopted by a friendly necrophiliac couple? Which is the better option?

I do not have an answer to outrageous hypotheticacls

 

[Allegra]

What is the essence of this question? The situation doesn’t exist that one has to choose between these two options, so you must be trying to prove or argue something with this. If you are asking in essence, “Is being adopted by a homosexual couple the worst possible fate for a child?” Obviously, the answer is “no”. There are any number of scenarios that would be worse. So what? Does that make adopting children to homosexual couples okay, because there are worse things?