B
BarbaraTherese
Guest
…a very important point!While many contemplatives and mystics go through similar experiences, it is much more salutary to walk according to the path along which the Lord is leading us individully (which may involve something as mundane as rotating the tires and cooking dinner) than to try to figure out which room of the castle we are in or which rung of the ladder are on . . .
But I dont think this precludes pondering in an objective way The Dark Night as a theological mystical process.
If a person is claiming the theological mystical state of The Dark Night, then yes, it would be best to have such stated by a good spiritual director. This however is not always given to every soul. And I think probaly for a person actually undergoing the mystical process to have a good director state it was THE Dark Night of the Soul would be cold comfort and no real consolation to that person. Rather confusion that such a lofty state could be ascribed to such barren suffering being endured…such is The Dark Night.If you’re engaging language like “dark night of the soul” you need to be under the direct personal supervision of a spiritual director who has sound experience with this sort of thing.
And as I think I have stated previously, personally I dont really have any problems at all if a person says that they are in the Dark Night…it does seem to be in some instance one of our sacred cows that create undue concern (almost panic!)to my mind. If a person is encouraged in personal suffering by using the term it is not problematic to me…it would however become problematic perhaps if I was writing a theological paper about the person.
Peace…Barb