Is the world "intelligible"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qoeleth
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
GEddie;14354510:
That’s why I wrote “intangible limits”, Eddie!
Yet the limits of the mind are not so obvious…

I don’t think it follows that the mind is limited in every respect. Otherwise what would become of free will? Even when we have only two choices we transcend our physical limitations - and often we have far more…
I’d hold that “freewill” is far more limited than we assume.

In any case, the tangible limits make the intangible ones somewhat beside the point. How can we determine our mind’s limits of knowledge, for example, when our heads so quickly stop working?

ICXC NIKA
 
Actually, if you make just one small assumption, then the world becomes perfectly “intelligible”. The bad things that happen to good people become perfectly understandable. The discord that exists within humanity becomes reasonable. And the conflict between doctrines becomes rational. In fact, every nuance of the world becomes intelligible if you make just one small assumption.

Unfortunately, people are afraid to make that assumption. And that assumption is, that solipsism is right. That the world wasn’t created by a benevolent God, it was created by me. The world is the way it is, because the mind can’t imagine anything else. The mind must exist in a world that explains what it is, and where it came from. So the mind creates its own reality, and in so doing it necessarily creates everything else. It creates evil, because it has to. It creates life and death, because it has to. It creates God, because it has to.

And it has to, because it can never ultimately explain where it came from. But in its struggle to explain where it came from, it creates a world that encompasses every possible explanation for where it came from. And it does this because it doesn’t know which one is right. It creates religion, and metaphysics, and science, and evolution, and the big bang. All in an effort to explain the existence of itself. Everything about the world logically follows from the simple realization that I am. And from the overarching need to explain what I am, and where I came from.

Reconciling a benevolent God with an inhumane world is one of the most difficult tasks for a theist. But for a solipsist, the explanation is simple. The world is the way it is because the “I am” is struggling to rationalize “Why I am”.

The world is the way it is, because I am.
People are afraid to make that assumption? What people?

You must be a lot of fun at your imaginary parties. True solipsism is irrefutable, but also irrefutably obnoxious. Please don’t be offended. You are typing this to yourself after all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top