N
Nihilist
Guest
I came across the writings of an Italian philosopher, Fredrico Buono- and can’t decide if he is actually writing philosophy- or just playing with the sonorities of words. Can anyone decipher this?
INVOCATIVE
To invoke a principle and its essence in a fatal ceremony is to express oneself
through an emphatic dogma in a structural form between limbo and the decomposition
going through the compression of the devotion deduced by the course
of the invocation.
The ramification is a balanced imprinting of the formal structure in a synthesis
during the course that widens the terms of behaviour with clear signs of a fatal
ceremony, which collocate the word ‘defendant’ at the centre of a representation
of a symbolic representation.
The expression of the clarifying signs brings an amorphous form of the stand-up
out of the word ‘defendant’. This is a temporal limbo composed by a form decomposed
between ‘composing’ and ‘decomposition’.
The essence of the nucleus of the form imprints a sign that progresses and
intensifies at the approaching of the beginning of the fatal ceremony in the Temple
of prophecy.
The completion of the ceremony is a shapeless and amorphous beginning of the
clarifying sign, which is the focus essence of the nucleus of the form structured
in the stand-up, composed, decomposed and formed in a prophesised temporal
limbo.
The nucleus grows and ends up in glimmers of resolution of formative contact
and in occlusions of undefined and not viable ravines.
Inserted in a prelude at the principle of individuation.
Composed in the course of a temporal ceremony proffered in a profanation.
I’d be interested to hear if you know of any more extreme examples.
INVOCATIVE
To invoke a principle and its essence in a fatal ceremony is to express oneself
through an emphatic dogma in a structural form between limbo and the decomposition
going through the compression of the devotion deduced by the course
of the invocation.
The ramification is a balanced imprinting of the formal structure in a synthesis
during the course that widens the terms of behaviour with clear signs of a fatal
ceremony, which collocate the word ‘defendant’ at the centre of a representation
of a symbolic representation.
The expression of the clarifying signs brings an amorphous form of the stand-up
out of the word ‘defendant’. This is a temporal limbo composed by a form decomposed
between ‘composing’ and ‘decomposition’.
The essence of the nucleus of the form imprints a sign that progresses and
intensifies at the approaching of the beginning of the fatal ceremony in the Temple
of prophecy.
The completion of the ceremony is a shapeless and amorphous beginning of the
clarifying sign, which is the focus essence of the nucleus of the form structured
in the stand-up, composed, decomposed and formed in a prophesised temporal
limbo.
The nucleus grows and ends up in glimmers of resolution of formative contact
and in occlusions of undefined and not viable ravines.
Inserted in a prelude at the principle of individuation.
Composed in the course of a temporal ceremony proffered in a profanation.
I’d be interested to hear if you know of any more extreme examples.
.